AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 14% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1090 MHz versus 954 MHz
- Environ 21% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1200 MHz versus 993 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 74% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 70 Watt versus 122 Watt
- 4.3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 65217 versus 15023
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1728 versus 1611
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 55.048 versus 46.273
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 969.655 versus 777.677
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.655 versus 3.914
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 76.807 versus 38.196
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 239.111 versus 82.511
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 8 August 2016 versus 12 March 2014 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1090 MHz versus 954 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz versus 993 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt versus 122 Watt |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 65217 versus 15023 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1728 versus 1611 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55.048 versus 46.273 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 969.655 versus 777.677 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.655 versus 3.914 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 76.807 versus 38.196 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 239.111 versus 82.511 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
- Environ 92% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 127.1 GTexel / s versus 66.08 GTexel / s
- Environ 71% de pipelines plus haut: 1536 versus 896
- 1386.4x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,050 gflops versus 2.2 TFLOPs
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 2 GB
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 127.1 GTexel / s versus 66.08 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1536 versus 896 |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,050 gflops versus 2.2 TFLOPs |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 2 GB |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 65217 | 15023 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1728 | 1611 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55.048 | 46.273 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 969.655 | 777.677 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.655 | 3.914 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 76.807 | 38.196 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 239.111 | 82.511 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3818 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 333 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4501 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4501 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Baffin | GK104 |
| Conception | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
| Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
| Date de sortie | 8 August 2016 | 12 March 2014 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $86 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 772 | 775 |
| Prix maintenant | $179.50 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 26.72 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | 993 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 14 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1090 MHz | 954 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 2.2 TFLOPs | 3,050 gflops |
| GPU Power | 35-48 Watt | |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 896 | 1536 |
| Stream Processors | 896 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 66.08 GTexel / s | 127.1 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt | 122 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,000 million | 3,540 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1536 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| VGA | ||
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Taille du laptop | large | large |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 112 GB/s | 160.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 2.0 | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) avec des autres
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Laptop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Laptop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960M
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Laptop) vs
AMDRadeon E8950
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Laptop) vs
NVIDIAQuadro M1200 Mobile
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Laptop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX330
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Laptop) vs
IntelUHD Graphics 750
