AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) versus NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) and NVIDIA Quadro K5100M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 41% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1090 MHz versus 771 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 43% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 70 Watt versus 100 Watt
- Environ 94% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 7000 MHz versus 3600 MHz
- 5.7x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 65217 versus 11427
- 9.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 55 versus 5.972
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 970.421 versus 355.305
- 4.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.656 versus 1.022
- 4.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 76.881 versus 15.706
- 6.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 237.944 versus 34.772
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 8 August 2016 versus 23 July 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1090 MHz versus 771 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt versus 100 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz versus 3600 MHz |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 65217 versus 11427 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55 versus 5.972 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 970.421 versus 355.305 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.656 versus 1.022 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 76.881 versus 15.706 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 237.944 versus 34.772 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
- Environ 49% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 98.69 GTexel / s versus 66.08 GTexel / s
- Environ 71% de pipelines plus haut: 1536 versus 896
- 1076.8x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,369 gflops versus 2.2 TFLOPs
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 2 GB
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 98.69 GTexel / s versus 66.08 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1536 versus 896 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,369 gflops versus 2.2 TFLOPs |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 2 GB |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) | NVIDIA Quadro K5100M |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 65217 | 11427 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1728 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55 | 5.972 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 970.421 | 355.305 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.656 | 1.022 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 76.881 | 15.706 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 237.944 | 34.772 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3191 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 350 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6747 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6747 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) | NVIDIA Quadro K5100M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Baffin | GK104 |
| Conception | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
| Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
| Date de sortie | 8 August 2016 | 23 July 2013 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $86 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 772 | 775 |
| Prix maintenant | $179.50 | $309.99 |
| Genre | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 26.72 | 13.80 |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | |
| Unités de Compute | 14 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1090 MHz | 771 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 2.2 TFLOPs | 2,369 gflops |
| GPU Power | 35-48 Watt | |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 896 | 1536 |
| Stream Processors | 896 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 66.08 GTexel / s | 98.69 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,000 million | 3,540 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| VGA | ||
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Taille du laptop | large | large |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
| Shader Model | 5 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 112 GB/s | 115.2 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz | 3600 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 2.0 | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) avec des autres
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Laptop) vs
NVIDIAQuadro K5100M
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Laptop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Laptop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960M
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Laptop) vs
NVIDIAQuadro M1200 Mobile
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Laptop) vs
NVIDIAQuadro P520
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Laptop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX330
