AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) and NVIDIA Quadro M3000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- 2x more texture fill rate: 137.5 GTexel / s vs 67.2 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 2048 vs 1,024
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 32% higher memory clock speed: 6600 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 33752 vs 16641
- Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 111.543 vs 82.563
- Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1817.005 vs 1266.506
- Around 94% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.511 vs 4.91
- Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 99.875 vs 70.779
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 511.362 vs 252.607
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9983 vs 7779
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9983 vs 7779
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 4 August 2016 vs 18 August 2015 |
| Texture fill rate | 137.5 GTexel / s vs 67.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2048 vs 1,024 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 6600 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 33752 vs 16641 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.543 vs 82.563 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1817.005 vs 1266.506 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.511 vs 4.91 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.875 vs 70.779 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 511.362 vs 252.607 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9983 vs 7779 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9983 vs 7779 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
- Around 13% higher core clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 926 MHz
- 438.8x better floating-point performance: 2,150 gflops vs 4.9 TFLOPs
- Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 120 Watt
- Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3720 vs 2443
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 1674
- Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3720 vs 2443
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 1674
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 926 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2,150 gflops vs 4.9 TFLOPs |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 120 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 vs 2443 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 1674 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 vs 2443 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 1674 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) | NVIDIA Quadro M3000M |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 33752 | 16641 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.543 | 82.563 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1817.005 | 1266.506 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.511 | 4.91 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.875 | 70.779 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 511.362 | 252.607 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9983 | 7779 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2443 | 3720 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1674 | 3360 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9983 | 7779 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2443 | 3720 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1674 | 3360 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 839 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5594 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 413 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) | NVIDIA Quadro M3000M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | Ellesmere | GM204 |
| Design | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
| GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
| Launch date | 4 August 2016 | 18 August 2015 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $549.99 | |
| Place in performance rating | 503 | 504 |
| Price now | $109.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 91.95 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1206 MHz | |
| Compute units | 32 | |
| Core clock speed | 926 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 4.9 TFLOPs | 2,150 gflops |
| GPU Power | 85-110 Watt | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 1,024 |
| Stream Processors | 2048 | |
| Texture fill rate | 137.5 GTexel / s | 67.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5,700 million | 5,200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| VGA | ||
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | large |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
| Shader Model | 5.0 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 211 GB/s | 160 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6600 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 2.0b | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) with others
AMDRadeon RX 470 (Laptop) vs
ATIRadeon X850 XT
AMDRadeon RX 470 (Laptop) vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 550
AMDRadeon RX 470 (Laptop) vs
AMDRadeon HD 7690M
AMDRadeon RX 470 (Laptop) vs
NVIDIAQuadro M3000M
AMDRadeon RX 470 (Laptop) vs
AMDRadeon E9550 MXM
AMDRadeon RX 470 (Laptop) vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6800X Duo
