AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) versus NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) and NVIDIA Quadro M3000M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 11 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 137.5 GTexel / s versus 67.2 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 2048 versus 1,024
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 32% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 6600 MHz versus 5012 MHz
- 2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 33752 versus 16641
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 111.543 versus 82.563
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1817.005 versus 1266.506
- Environ 94% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.511 versus 4.91
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 99.875 versus 70.779
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 511.362 versus 252.607
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9983 versus 7779
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9983 versus 7779
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 4 August 2016 versus 18 August 2015 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 137.5 GTexel / s versus 67.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2048 versus 1,024 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6600 MHz versus 5012 MHz |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 33752 versus 16641 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.543 versus 82.563 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1817.005 versus 1266.506 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.511 versus 4.91 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.875 versus 70.779 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 511.362 versus 252.607 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9983 versus 7779 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9983 versus 7779 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
- Environ 13% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1050 MHz versus 926 MHz
- 438.8x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,150 gflops versus 4.9 TFLOPs
- Environ 60% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 120 Watt
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3720 versus 2443
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 versus 1674
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3720 versus 2443
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 versus 1674
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1050 MHz versus 926 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,150 gflops versus 4.9 TFLOPs |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 120 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 versus 2443 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 versus 1674 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 versus 2443 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 versus 1674 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) | NVIDIA Quadro M3000M |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 33752 | 16641 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.543 | 82.563 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1817.005 | 1266.506 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.511 | 4.91 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.875 | 70.779 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 511.362 | 252.607 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9983 | 7779 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2443 | 3720 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1674 | 3360 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9983 | 7779 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2443 | 3720 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1674 | 3360 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 839 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5594 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 413 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) | NVIDIA Quadro M3000M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Nom de code | Ellesmere | GM204 |
| Conception | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
| Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
| Date de sortie | 4 August 2016 | 18 August 2015 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $549.99 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 503 | 504 |
| Prix maintenant | $109.99 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 91.95 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1206 MHz | |
| Unités de Compute | 32 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 926 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 4.9 TFLOPs | 2,150 gflops |
| GPU Power | 85-110 Watt | |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 1,024 |
| Stream Processors | 2048 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 137.5 GTexel / s | 67.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 5,700 million | 5,200 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| VGA | ||
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | large |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
| Shader Model | 5.0 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 211 GB/s | 160 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6600 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 2.0b | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) avec des autres
AMDRadeon RX 470 (Laptop) vs
ATIRadeon X850 XT
AMDRadeon RX 470 (Laptop) vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 550
AMDRadeon RX 470 (Laptop) vs
AMDRadeon HD 7690M
AMDRadeon RX 470 (Laptop) vs
NVIDIAQuadro M3000M
AMDRadeon RX 470 (Laptop) vs
AMDRadeon E9550 MXM
AMDRadeon RX 470 (Laptop) vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6800X Duo
