AMD Radeon RX 480 vs AMD FirePro W5100
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 480 and AMD FirePro W5100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 480
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 20% higher core clock speed: 1120 MHz vs 930 MHz
- 4.1x more texture fill rate: 182.3 GTexel / s vs 44.64 GTexel / s
- 3x more pipelines: 2304 vs 768
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 6000 MHz
- 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8578 vs 2978
- Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 774 vs 531
- 3.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39538 vs 11724
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 103.851 vs 35.15
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.593 vs 3.199
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 67.879 vs 57.354
- 3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 597.772 vs 163.258
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11172 vs 4397
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3719 vs 3688
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11172 vs 4397
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3719 vs 3688
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 June 2016 vs 31 March 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1120 MHz vs 930 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 182.3 GTexel / s vs 44.64 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 768 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 6000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8578 vs 2978 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 774 vs 531 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39538 vs 11724 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 103.851 vs 35.15 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.593 vs 3.199 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 67.879 vs 57.354 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 597.772 vs 163.258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11172 vs 4397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 3688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11172 vs 4397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 3688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3356 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W5100
- 246.2x better floating-point performance: 1,428 gflops vs 5.8 TFLOPs
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 838.518 vs 769.541
Specifications (specs) | |
Floating-point performance | 1,428 gflops vs 5.8 TFLOPs |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 838.518 vs 769.541 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 480
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W5100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 480 | AMD FirePro W5100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8578 | 2978 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 774 | 531 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39538 | 11724 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 103.851 | 35.15 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 769.541 | 838.518 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.593 | 3.199 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 67.879 | 57.354 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 597.772 | 163.258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11172 | 4397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 3688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11172 | 4397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 3688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 966 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 480 | AMD FirePro W5100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | Ellesmere | Bonaire |
Design | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch date | 29 June 2016 | 31 March 2014 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | |
Place in performance rating | 360 | 627 |
Price now | $299.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 39.12 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1266 MHz | |
Compute units | 36 | |
Core clock speed | 1120 MHz | 930 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 5.8 TFLOPs | 1,428 gflops |
GPU Power | 110 Watt | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | 768 |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Texture fill rate | 182.3 GTexel / s | 44.64 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 2,080 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 4x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
HD сomponent video output | ||
StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Bus support | n / a | PCIe 3.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | 171 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Form factor | Full Height / Half Length | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_0) |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 96 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
Enduro | ||
FreeSync | ||
FRTC | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HD3D | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready | ||
ZeroCore |