AMD Radeon RX 5300M vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5300M and NVIDIA Quadro K6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

AMD Radeon RX 5300M

NVIDIA Quadro K6000

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5300M

Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 3 month(s) later
Around 30% higher core clock speed: 1036 MHz vs 797 MHz
Around 60% higher boost clock speed: 1445 MHz vs 902 MHz
587.5x more texture fill rate: 127.2 GTexel/s vs 216.5 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
2.6x lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 225 Watt
2.3x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 6008 MHz
Around 52% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 36495 vs 24030

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	13 Nov 2019 vs 23 July 2013
Core clock speed	1036 MHz vs 797 MHz
Boost clock speed	1445 MHz vs 902 MHz
Texture fill rate	127.2 GTexel/s vs 216.5 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	85 Watt vs 225 Watt
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz vs 6008 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	36495 vs 24030

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K6000

2x more pipelines: 2880 vs 1408
4x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 3 GB
Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12657 vs 9813
Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12657 vs 9813
Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 535 vs 415
Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8060 vs 4847

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	2880 vs 1408
Maximum memory size	12 GB vs 3 GB
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	12657 vs 9813
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	12657 vs 9813
PassMark - G2D Mark	535 vs 415
PassMark - G3D Mark	8060 vs 4847
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3711 vs 3695
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3711 vs 3695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3356 vs 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3356 vs 3353

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5300M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K6000

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9813

12657

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9813

12657

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

36495

24030

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

415

535

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

4847

8060

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3695

3711

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3695

3711

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3353

3356

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3353

3356

Name	AMD Radeon RX 5300M	NVIDIA Quadro K6000
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9813	12657
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9813	12657
Geekbench - OpenCL	36495	24030
PassMark - G2D Mark	415	535
PassMark - G3D Mark	4847	8060
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3695	3711
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3695	3711
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3353	3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3353	3356
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		67.178
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1816.61
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		7.435
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		88.889
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		355.166

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon RX 5300M	NVIDIA Quadro K6000
Essentials
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	Kepler
Code name	Navi 14	GK110B
Launch date	13 Nov 2019	23 July 2013
Place in performance rating	376	374
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$5,265
Price now		$833.98
Value for money (0-100)		11.34
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1445 MHz	902 MHz
Compute units	22
Core clock speed	1036 MHz	797 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	254.3 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	8.138 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	4.069 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1408	2880
Pixel fill rate	46.24 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	127.2 GTexel/s	216.5 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	85 Watt	225 Watt
Transistor count	6400 million	7,080 million
Floating-point performance		5,196 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
HDMI
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size	medium sized
Supplementary power connectors	None	2x 6-pin
Length		267 mm
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_1)
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	3 GB	12 GB
Memory bandwidth	168.0 GB/s	288.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	96 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	6008 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5