AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT

• Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
• Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13686 vs 12930
• Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 880 vs 813
• Around 6% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 64854 vs 61407
• Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3560.776 vs 2573.643
• Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 20.486 vs 16.447
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 148.938 vs 145.886
• Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1111.648 vs 926.614
• Around 23% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7709 vs 6260

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

• Around 33% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1130 MHz
• Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1560 MHz
• Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 150 Watt
• 8x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
• Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16952 vs 13621
• Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16952 vs 13621

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	13686 12930
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	880 813
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	64854 61407
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	207.909 208.608
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3560.776 2573.643
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.486 16.447
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	148.938 145.886
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1111.648 926.614
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13621 16952
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3719 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3355
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13621 16952
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3719 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3355
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	7709 6260

Compare specifications (specs)