AMD Radeon RX 560X vs AMD Radeon R9 280X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 560X and AMD Radeon R9 280X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 560X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 28% higher boost clock speed: 1275 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 637.5x more texture fill rate: 81.60 GTexel/s vs 128.0 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4873 vs 3700
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4873 vs 3700
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 April 2018 vs 8 October 2013 |
Boost clock speed | 1275 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 81.60 GTexel/s vs 128.0 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 3 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4873 vs 3700 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4873 vs 3700 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 280X
- 2x more pipelines: 2048 vs 1024
- 1575.4x better floating-point performance: 4,096 gflops vs 2.6 TFLOPs
- Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9603 vs 5698
- Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9603 vs 5698
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 677 vs 669
- Around 74% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6166 vs 3553
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 1024 |
Floating-point performance | 4,096 gflops vs 2.6 TFLOPs |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9603 vs 5698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9603 vs 5698 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 677 vs 669 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6166 vs 3553 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 560X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 280X
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 560X | AMD Radeon R9 280X |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5698 | 9603 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5698 | 9603 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 669 | 677 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3553 | 6166 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16461 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4873 | 3700 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4873 | 3700 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3357 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 89.187 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1434.496 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.656 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 87.459 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 493.57 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2351 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 560X | AMD Radeon R9 280X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Polaris 21 | Tahiti |
Design | Radeon RX 500X Series | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch date | 3 April 2018 | 8 October 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 390 | 391 |
Type | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1275 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Compute units | 14/16 | |
Core clock speed | 1175 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 2.6 TFLOPs | 4,096 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 2048 |
Pixel fill rate | 20.40 GP/s | |
Render output units | 16 | |
Stream Processors | 896/1024 | 2048 |
Texture fill rate | 81.60 GTexel/s | 128.0 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 64 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 4,313 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 170 mm | 275 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 288 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |