AMD Radeon RX 570 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 570 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 570
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- 2383x more texture fill rate: 159.23 GTexel/s vs 66.82 GTexel / s
- 2.7x more pipelines: 2048 vs 768
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 1000x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 7 GB/s
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6967 vs 6332
- Around 74% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 36107 vs 20732
- Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 105.688 vs 75.758
- Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1083.926 vs 843.503
- Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.251 vs 5.071
- 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 79.029 vs 24.676
- Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 520.089 vs 301.168
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9172 vs 8496
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9172 vs 8496
- 2.9x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 880 vs 305
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 25 October 2016 |
Texture fill rate | 159.23 GTexel/s vs 66.82 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 768 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 7 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6967 vs 6332 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 36107 vs 20732 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.688 vs 75.758 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1083.926 vs 843.503 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.251 vs 5.071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 79.029 vs 24.676 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 520.089 vs 301.168 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9172 vs 8496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9172 vs 8496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 3336 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 880 vs 305 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
- Around 50% higher core clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 926-1168 MHz
- Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 1206-1244 MHz
- 419.2x better floating-point performance: 2,138 gflops vs 5.1 TFLOPs
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 650 vs 626
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3687 vs 3624
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3687 vs 3624
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1392 MHz vs 926-1168 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1392 MHz vs 1206-1244 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,138 gflops vs 5.1 TFLOPs |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 650 vs 626 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 vs 3624 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 vs 3624 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 570
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 570 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6967 | 6332 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 626 | 650 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 36107 | 20732 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.688 | 75.758 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1083.926 | 843.503 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.251 | 5.071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 79.029 | 24.676 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 520.089 | 301.168 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9172 | 8496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3624 | 3687 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9172 | 8496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3624 | 3687 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3336 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 880 | 305 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 570 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Polaris 20 | GP107 |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 25 October 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $169 | $139 |
Place in performance rating | 405 | 487 |
Price now | $149.99 | $159.99 |
Type | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 59.00 | 46.07 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1206-1244 MHz | 1392 MHz |
Core clock speed | 926-1168 MHz | 1392 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 5.1 TFLOPs | 2,138 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 768 |
Pixel fill rate | 39.81 GP/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Texture fill rate | 159.23 GTexel/s | 66.82 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 128 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 3,300 million |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | 145 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 112 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 7 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |