AMD Radeon RX 570 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 570 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 570
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 926-1168 MHz vs 915 MHz
- Around 23% higher boost clock speed: 1206-1244 MHz vs 980 MHz
- 1450.2x more texture fill rate: 159.23 GTexel/s vs 109.8 GTexel / s
- Around 52% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1344
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 13% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 170 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 6008 MHz
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6967 vs 5427
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9172 vs 8276
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9172 vs 8276
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 25 August 2013 |
Core clock speed | 926-1168 MHz vs 915 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1206-1244 MHz vs 980 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 159.23 GTexel/s vs 109.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 1344 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 170 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 6008 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6967 vs 5427 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9172 vs 8276 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9172 vs 8276 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
- 516.5x better floating-point performance: 2,634 gflops vs 5.1 TFLOPs
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 694 vs 626
Specifications (specs) | |
Floating-point performance | 2,634 gflops vs 5.1 TFLOPs |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 694 vs 626 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3627 vs 3624 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3627 vs 3624 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 3346 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 570
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 570 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6967 | 5427 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 626 | 694 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 36141 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.688 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1083.926 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.251 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 79.029 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 520.089 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9172 | 8276 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3624 | 3627 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9172 | 8276 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3624 | 3627 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3354 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3861 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 570 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Polaris 20 | GK104 |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 25 August 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $169 | |
Place in performance rating | 396 | 306 |
Price now | $149.99 | |
Type | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 59.00 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1206-1244 MHz | 980 MHz |
Core clock speed | 926-1168 MHz | 915 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 5.1 TFLOPs | 2,634 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 1344 |
Pixel fill rate | 39.81 GP/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Texture fill rate | 159.23 GTexel/s | 109.8 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 128 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 170 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 3,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | 241 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 192.3 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |