AMD Radeon RX 570 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 570 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 570
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 6% higher core clock speed: 926-1168 MHz vs 875 MHz
- Around 30% higher boost clock speed: 1206-1244 MHz vs 928 MHz
- 758.2x more texture fill rate: 159.23 GTexel/s vs 210 billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 3 GB
- 1000x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
- Around 24% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 35108 vs 28293
- Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 105.688 vs 75.429
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.251 vs 6.854
- Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 79.029 vs 58.067
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 520.089 vs 182.11
- Around 15% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3858 vs 3365
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 7 November 2013 |
Core clock speed | 926-1168 MHz vs 875 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1206-1244 MHz vs 928 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 159.23 GTexel/s vs 210 billion / sec |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 3 GB |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 35108 vs 28293 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.688 vs 75.429 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.251 vs 6.854 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 79.029 vs 58.067 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 520.089 vs 182.11 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 3342 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 3342 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3858 vs 3365 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
- Around 41% higher pipelines: 2880 vs 2048
- 1048x better floating-point performance: 5,345 gflops vs 5.1 TFLOPs
- Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9528 vs 6967
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 633 vs 626
- Around 85% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2001.15 vs 1083.926
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10021 vs 9172
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3699 vs 3624
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10021 vs 9172
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3699 vs 3624
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2880 vs 2048 |
Floating-point performance | 5,345 gflops vs 5.1 TFLOPs |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9528 vs 6967 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 633 vs 626 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2001.15 vs 1083.926 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10021 vs 9172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 vs 3624 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10021 vs 9172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 vs 3624 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 570
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 570 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6967 | 9528 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 626 | 633 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 35108 | 28293 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.688 | 75.429 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1083.926 | 2001.15 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.251 | 6.854 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 79.029 | 58.067 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 520.089 | 182.11 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9172 | 10021 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3624 | 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3342 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9172 | 10021 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3624 | 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3342 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3858 | 3365 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 570 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Polaris 20 | GK110B |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 7 November 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $169 | $699 |
Place in performance rating | 405 | 407 |
Price now | $149.99 | $749.99 |
Type | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 59.00 | 14.80 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1206-1244 MHz | 928 MHz |
Core clock speed | 926-1168 MHz | 875 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 5.1 TFLOPs | 5,345 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 2880 |
Pixel fill rate | 39.81 GP/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Texture fill rate | 159.23 GTexel/s | 210 billion / sec |
Texture Units | 128 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 7,080 million |
CUDA cores | 2880 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | One 8-pin and one 6-pin |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 3 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 336 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 7.0 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |