AMD Radeon RX 570 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 570 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 570

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
  • Around 6% higher core clock speed: 926-1168 MHz vs 875 MHz
  • Around 30% higher boost clock speed: 1206-1244 MHz vs 928 MHz
  • 758.2x more texture fill rate: 159.23 GTexel/s vs 210 billion / sec
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
  • 2.7x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 3 GB
  • 1000x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
  • Around 28% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 36141 vs 28211
  • Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 105.688 vs 75.429
  • Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.251 vs 6.854
  • Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 79.029 vs 58.067
  • 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 520.089 vs 182.11
  • Around 16% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3862 vs 3338
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 18 April 2017 vs 7 November 2013
Core clock speed 926-1168 MHz vs 875 MHz
Boost clock speed 1206-1244 MHz vs 928 MHz
Texture fill rate 159.23 GTexel/s vs 210 billion / sec
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
Maximum memory size 8 GB vs 3 GB
Memory clock speed 7000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 36141 vs 28211
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 105.688 vs 75.429
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 8.251 vs 6.854
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 79.029 vs 58.067
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 520.089 vs 182.11
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3346 vs 3342
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3346 vs 3342
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 3862 vs 3338

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti

  • Around 41% higher pipelines: 2880 vs 2048
  • 1048x better floating-point performance: 5,345 gflops vs 5.1 TFLOPs
  • Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9517 vs 6967
  • Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 635 vs 626
  • Around 85% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2001.15 vs 1083.926
  • Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10021 vs 9172
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3699 vs 3624
  • Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10021 vs 9172
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3699 vs 3624
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 2880 vs 2048
Floating-point performance 5,345 gflops vs 5.1 TFLOPs
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 9517 vs 6967
PassMark - G2D Mark 635 vs 626
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 2001.15 vs 1083.926
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 10021 vs 9172
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3699 vs 3624
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 10021 vs 9172
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3699 vs 3624

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 570
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
6967
9517
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
626
635
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
36141
28211
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
105.688
75.429
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1083.926
2001.15
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8.251
6.854
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
79.029
58.067
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
520.089
182.11
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9172
10021
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3624
3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3346
3342
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9172
10021
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3624
3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3346
3342
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
3862
3338
Name AMD Radeon RX 570 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark 6967 9517
PassMark - G2D Mark 626 635
Geekbench - OpenCL 36141 28211
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 105.688 75.429
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1083.926 2001.15
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 8.251 6.854
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 79.029 58.067
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 520.089 182.11
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9172 10021
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3624 3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3346 3342
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9172 10021
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3624 3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3346 3342
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 3862 3338

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon RX 570 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti

Essentials

Architecture GCN 4.0 Kepler
Code name Polaris 20 GK110B
Design Radeon RX 500 Series
GCN generation 4th Gen
Launch date 18 April 2017 7 November 2013
Launch price (MSRP) $169 $699
Place in performance rating 396 397
Price now $149.99 $749.99
Type Desktop, Laptop Desktop
Value for money (0-100) 59.00 14.80

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1206-1244 MHz 928 MHz
Core clock speed 926-1168 MHz 875 MHz
Floating-point performance 5.1 TFLOPs 5,345 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 2048 2880
Pixel fill rate 39.81 GP/s
Render output units 32
Stream Processors 2048
Texture fill rate 159.23 GTexel/s 210 billion / sec
Texture Units 128
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 150 Watt 250 Watt
Transistor count 5,700 million 7,080 million
CUDA cores 2880

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI...
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
HDMI
VGA
Audio input for HDMI Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bridgeless CrossFire
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 241 mm 10.5" (26.7 cm)
Recommended system power (PSU) 450 Watt
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin One 8-pin and one 6-pin
Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Height 4.376" (11.1 cm)

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 12.0 (11_1)
OpenCL 2.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 3 GB
Memory bandwidth 224 GB/s 336 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 bit 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 7000 MHz 7.0 GB/s
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

4K H264 Decode
4K H264 Encode
AMD Eyefinity
AMD Radeon™ Chill
AMD Radeon™ ReLive
CrossFire
FreeSync
H265/HEVC Decode
H265/HEVC Encode
HDMI 4K Support
PowerTune
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)
3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
Blu Ray 3D
CUDA
FXAA
GeForce Experience
GPU Boost
SLI
TXAA