AMD Radeon RX 570 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 570 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 570
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 6% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 926-1168 MHz versus 875 MHz
- Environ 30% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1206-1244 MHz versus 928 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 159.23 GTexel/s versus 210 billion / sec
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 67% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 150 Watt versus 250 Watt
- 2.7x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 3 GB
- 1000x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 7000 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 35108 versus 28119
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 105.688 versus 75.429
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.251 versus 6.854
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 79.029 versus 58.067
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 520.089 versus 182.11
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3858 versus 3365
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 versus 7 November 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 926-1168 MHz versus 875 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1206-1244 MHz versus 928 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 159.23 GTexel/s versus 210 billion / sec |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 3 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 35108 versus 28119 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.688 versus 75.429 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.251 versus 6.854 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 79.029 versus 58.067 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 520.089 versus 182.11 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 versus 3342 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 versus 3342 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3858 versus 3365 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
- Environ 41% de pipelines plus haut: 2880 versus 2048
- 1048x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 5,345 gflops versus 5.1 TFLOPs
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 9528 versus 6967
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 633 versus 626
- Environ 85% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2001.15 versus 1083.926
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10021 versus 9172
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3699 versus 3624
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10021 versus 9172
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3699 versus 3624
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 2880 versus 2048 |
Performance á point flottant | 5,345 gflops versus 5.1 TFLOPs |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9528 versus 6967 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 633 versus 626 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2001.15 versus 1083.926 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10021 versus 9172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 versus 3624 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10021 versus 9172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 versus 3624 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 570
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 570 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6967 | 9528 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 626 | 633 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 35108 | 28119 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.688 | 75.429 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1083.926 | 2001.15 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.251 | 6.854 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 79.029 | 58.067 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 520.089 | 182.11 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9172 | 10021 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3624 | 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3342 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9172 | 10021 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3624 | 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3342 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3858 | 3365 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 570 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
Nom de code | Polaris 20 | GK110B |
Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 | 7 November 2013 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $169 | $699 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 405 | 407 |
Prix maintenant | $149.99 | $749.99 |
Genre | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 59.00 | 14.80 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1206-1244 MHz | 928 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 926-1168 MHz | 875 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 5.1 TFLOPs | 5,345 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 2880 |
Pixel fill rate | 39.81 GP/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 159.23 GTexel/s | 210 billion / sec |
Texture Units | 128 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 5,700 million | 7,080 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 2880 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 241 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | One 8-pin and one 6-pin |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 3 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 224 GB/s | 336 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 384 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz | 7.0 GB/s |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |