AMD Radeon RX 570 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 570 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 570
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 71% higher core clock speed: 926-1168 MHz vs 540 MHz
- 36858.8x more texture fill rate: 159.23 GTexel/s vs 4.32 GTexel / s
- 256x more pipelines: 2048 vs 8
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
- 32x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 256 MB
- 7x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 64.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6967 vs 108
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 626 vs 481
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 6 November 2008 |
Core clock speed | 926-1168 MHz vs 540 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 159.23 GTexel/s vs 4.32 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 8 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6967 vs 108 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 626 vs 481 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP
- 3.4x better floating-point performance: 17.28 gflops vs 5.1 TFLOPs
- 6x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 150 Watt
Floating-point performance | 17.28 gflops vs 5.1 TFLOPs |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 570
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 570 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6967 | 108 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 626 | 481 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 36141 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.688 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1083.926 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.251 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 79.029 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 520.089 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9172 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3624 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9172 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3624 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3860 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 570 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Tesla |
Code name | Polaris 20 | G98 |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 6 November 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $169 | $129 |
Place in performance rating | 396 | 316 |
Price now | $149.99 | |
Type | Desktop, Laptop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 59.00 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1206-1244 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 926-1168 MHz | 540 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 5.1 TFLOPs | 17.28 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 8 |
Pixel fill rate | 39.81 GP/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Texture fill rate | 159.23 GTexel/s | 4.32 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 128 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 25 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DMS-59 |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | 198 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 10.0 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR2 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |