AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT vs AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT and AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 78% higher core clock speed: 1605 MHz vs 900 MHz
- 2.1x more boost clock speed: 1905 MHz vs 925 MHz
- 5.1x more texture fill rate: 304.8 GT/s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 9% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 77153 vs 70535
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14699 vs 6316
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14699 vs 6316
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 July 2019 vs 13 March 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1605 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1905 MHz vs 925 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 304.8 GT/s vs 59.2 GTexel / s |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 77153 vs 70535 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14699 vs 6316 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14699 vs 6316 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 225 Watt
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8390 vs 3720
- 8.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 27566 vs 3369
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8390 vs 3720
- 8.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 27566 vs 3369
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 225 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8390 vs 3720 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 27566 vs 3369 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8390 vs 3720 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 27566 vs 3369 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16667 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 927 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 77153 | 70535 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 252.601 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3949.565 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.769 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1322.129 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14699 | 6316 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 8390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3369 | 27566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14699 | 6316 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 8390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3369 | 27566 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9486 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Navi 10 | Pitcairn |
| Launch date | 7 July 2019 | 13 March 2015 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $400 | |
| Place in performance rating | 148 | 165 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1905 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Compute units | 40 | |
| Core clock speed | 1605 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.51 TFLOPs | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.75 TFLOPs | |
| Pixel fill rate | 121.9 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Stream Processors | 2560 | |
| Texture fill rate | 304.8 GT/s | 59.2 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 160 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10.3 B | 2,800 million |
| Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | |
| Pipelines | 1024 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 153.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT with others
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT vs
NVIDIATITAN V
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Super
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT vs
AMDRadeon Pro W5700X
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT vs
AMDRadeon RX 6600M
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 1010
