AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 662 vs 444
- Around 19% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 34854 vs 29363
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 115.237 vs 111.55
- Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1890.261 vs 1371.266
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.121 vs 8.49
- 7.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 149.333 vs 19.803
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 614.542 vs 509.222
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3709 vs 3654
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3709 vs 3654
- Around 3% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3782 vs 3666
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 October 2018 vs 15 August 2016 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 662 vs 444 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34854 vs 29363 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 115.237 vs 111.55 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1890.261 vs 1371.266 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.121 vs 8.49 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 149.333 vs 19.803 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 614.542 vs 509.222 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 vs 3654 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 vs 3654 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3782 vs 3666 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
- Around 29% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1168 MHz
- Around 33% higher boost clock speed: 1708 MHz vs 1284 MHz
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 7000 MHz
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8161 vs 7708
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12645 vs 9258
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12645 vs 9258
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 1168 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1708 MHz vs 1284 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 7000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8161 vs 7708 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12645 vs 9258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12645 vs 9258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3351 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7708 | 8161 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 662 | 444 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34854 | 29363 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 115.237 | 111.55 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1890.261 | 1371.266 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.121 | 8.49 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 149.333 | 19.803 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 614.542 | 509.222 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9258 | 12645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 | 3654 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9258 | 12645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 | 3654 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3782 | 3666 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Polaris 20 | GP106B |
Launch date | 15 October 2018 | 15 August 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 335 | 401 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $237.11 | |
Price now | $229.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 49.49 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1284 MHz | 1708 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1168 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 120 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 4,400 million |
CUDA cores | 1280 | |
Floating-point performance | 4,275 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Pipelines | 1280 | |
Texture fill rate | 133.6 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | DP 1.43, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 8008 MHz |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 192 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
GameStream | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
Surround | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready |