AMD Radeon RX 590 vs AMD Radeon HD 7750M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 590 and AMD Radeon HD 7750M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 590
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 1469 MHz vs 575 MHz
- 12091.3x more texture fill rate: 222.48 GTexel/s vs 18.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- 2x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 4000 MHz
- 7.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9373 vs 1191
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 787 vs 693
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 3551
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 3551
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 November 2018 vs 24 April 2012 |
Core clock speed | 1469 MHz vs 575 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 222.48 GTexel/s vs 18.4 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 4000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9373 vs 1191 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 787 vs 693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3551 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3551 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7750M
- 82.9x better floating-point performance: 588.8 gflops vs 7.1 TFLOPs
- 6.3x lower typical power consumption: 28 Watt vs 175 Watt
Floating-point performance | 588.8 gflops vs 7.1 TFLOPs |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 28 Watt vs 175 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 590
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7750M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 590 | AMD Radeon HD 7750M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9373 | 1191 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 787 | 693 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 45597 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 137.469 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2083.862 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.352 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 139.477 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 762.142 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13383 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3551 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13383 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3551 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1080 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 590 | AMD Radeon HD 7750M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Polaris 30 | Chelsea |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
Launch date | 15 November 2018 | 24 April 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $279 | |
Place in performance rating | 284 | 287 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz | |
Compute units | 36 | |
Core clock speed | 1469 MHz | 575 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 7.1 TFLOPs | 588.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Pixel fill rate | 49.54 GP/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Texture fill rate | 222.48 GTexel/s | 18.4 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 28 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 1,500 million |
Pipelines | 512 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 64 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support |