AMD Radeon RX 590 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 590 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 590
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 23% lower typical power consumption: 175 Watt vs 215 Watt
Launch date | 15 November 2018 vs 20 September 2018 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt vs 215 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1515 MHz vs 1469 MHz
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1710 MHz vs 1545 MHz
- Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 8000 MHz
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18750 vs 9374
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 908 vs 789
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 105219 vs 45591
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 326.494 vs 137.469
- Around 89% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3938.377 vs 2083.862
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 31.684 vs 12.352
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 159.275 vs 139.477
- Around 98% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1506.874 vs 762.142
- Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25500 vs 13383
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6966 vs 3716
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6293 vs 3359
- Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25500 vs 13383
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6966 vs 3716
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6293 vs 3359
- Around 62% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1752 vs 1081
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1515 MHz vs 1469 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1710 MHz vs 1545 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 8000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18750 vs 9374 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 908 vs 789 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 105219 vs 45591 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 326.494 vs 137.469 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3938.377 vs 2083.862 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.684 vs 12.352 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 159.275 vs 139.477 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1506.874 vs 762.142 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25500 vs 13383 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6966 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6293 vs 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25500 vs 13383 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6966 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6293 vs 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1752 vs 1081 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 590
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 590 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9374 | 18750 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 789 | 908 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 45591 | 105219 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 137.469 | 326.494 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2083.862 | 3938.377 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.352 | 31.684 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 139.477 | 159.275 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 762.142 | 1506.874 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13383 | 25500 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 6966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 6293 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13383 | 25500 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 6966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 6293 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1081 | 1752 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 590 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Turing |
Code name | Polaris 30 | TU104 |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
Launch date | 15 November 2018 | 20 September 2018 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $279 | $699 |
Place in performance rating | 280 | 105 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Price now | $749.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 32.34 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz | 1710 MHz |
Compute units | 36 | |
Core clock speed | 1469 MHz | 1515 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 7.1 TFLOPs | |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Pixel fill rate | 49.54 GP/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Texture fill rate | 222.48 GTexel/s | |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 215 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 13,600 million |
Pipelines | 2944 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 256 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support |