AMD Radeon RX 590 versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 590 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 590
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 23% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 175 Watt versus 215 Watt
Date de sortie | 15 November 2018 versus 20 September 2018 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt versus 215 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
- Environ 3% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1515 MHz versus 1469 MHz
- Environ 11% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1710 MHz versus 1545 MHz
- Environ 75% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 8000 MHz
- 2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 18750 versus 9374
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 908 versus 789
- 2.3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 105219 versus 45591
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 326.494 versus 137.469
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3938.377 versus 2083.862
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 31.684 versus 12.352
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 159.275 versus 139.477
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1506.874 versus 762.142
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25500 versus 13383
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6966 versus 3716
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6293 versus 3359
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25500 versus 13383
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6966 versus 3716
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6293 versus 3359
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1752 versus 1081
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1515 MHz versus 1469 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1710 MHz versus 1545 MHz |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 8000 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18750 versus 9374 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 908 versus 789 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 105219 versus 45591 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 326.494 versus 137.469 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3938.377 versus 2083.862 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.684 versus 12.352 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 159.275 versus 139.477 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1506.874 versus 762.142 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25500 versus 13383 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6966 versus 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6293 versus 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25500 versus 13383 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6966 versus 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6293 versus 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1752 versus 1081 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 590
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 590 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9374 | 18750 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 789 | 908 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 45591 | 105219 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 137.469 | 326.494 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2083.862 | 3938.377 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.352 | 31.684 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 139.477 | 159.275 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 762.142 | 1506.874 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13383 | 25500 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 6966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 6293 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13383 | 25500 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 6966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 6293 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1081 | 1752 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 590 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Turing |
Nom de code | Polaris 30 | TU104 |
Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
Date de sortie | 15 November 2018 | 20 September 2018 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $279 | $699 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 280 | 105 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix maintenant | $749.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 32.34 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1545 MHz | 1710 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 36 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1469 MHz | 1515 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 7.1 TFLOPs | |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Pixel fill rate | 49.54 GP/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 222.48 GTexel/s | |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 215 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 5,700 million | 13,600 million |
Pipelines | 2944 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 241 mm | 267 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 256 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support |