AMD Radeon RX 640 vs AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 640 and AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 640
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1082 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1218 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- 1546.8x more texture fill rate: 38.98 GTexel/s vs 25.2 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3278 vs 2097
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3278 vs 2097
- Around 32% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10390 vs 7888
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 5 May 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1082 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1218 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s vs 25.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 vs 384 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3278 vs 2097 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3278 vs 2097 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10390 vs 7888 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective)
- Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3127 vs 1769
- Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3127 vs 1769
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6862 vs 2775
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6862 vs 2775
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3127 vs 1769 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3127 vs 1769 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6862 vs 2775 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6862 vs 2775 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 640
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 640 | AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1769 | 3127 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1769 | 3127 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2775 | 6862 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2775 | 6862 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3278 | 2097 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3278 | 2097 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10390 | 7888 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 339 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1954 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 640 | AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Arctic Islands | Oland |
Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 5 May 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 811 | 832 |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1218 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Compute units | 8 | |
Core clock speed | 1082 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 77.95 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 512 | 384 |
Pixel fill rate | 19.49 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s | 25.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 65 Watt |
Transistor count | 2200 million | 1,040 million |
Floating-point performance | 806.4 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Length | 5.7 inches (145 mm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | 32 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) | 2000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |