AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT and NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 13 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 43% higher core clock speed: 1968 MHz vs 1375 MHz
- 12553x more texture fill rate: 331.4 GTexel/s vs 26.4 billion / sec
- 21.3x more pipelines: 2048 vs 96
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 65 nm
- 21.3x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 384 MB
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 800 MHz
- 51x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16471 vs 323
- 10.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 911 vs 90
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3367 vs 2160
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3367 vs 2160
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 Jul 2021 vs 28 April 2008 |
Core clock speed | 1968 MHz vs 1375 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 331.4 GTexel/s vs 26.4 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 96 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 384 MB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16471 vs 323 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 911 vs 90 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3367 vs 2160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3367 vs 2160 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO
- Around 52% lower typical power consumption: 105 Watt vs 160 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 105 Watt vs 160 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT | NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16471 | 323 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 911 | 90 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 82703 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 706.665 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15486 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3728 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3367 | 2160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15486 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3728 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3367 | 2160 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1804 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT | NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | Navi 23 XT | G92 |
Launch date | 30 Jul 2021 | 28 April 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $379 | $49.99 |
Place in performance rating | 191 | 1430 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Price now | $49.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.43 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2589 MHz | |
Compute units | 32 | |
Core clock speed | 1968 MHz | 1375 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 65 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 662.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 21.21 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.60 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2048 | 96 |
Pixel fill rate | 165.7 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 331.4 GTexel/s | 26.4 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 105 Watt |
Transistor count | 11060 million | 754 million |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Floating-point performance | 264 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, Dual Link DVIHDTV |
DisplayPort count | 3 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Height | 40 mm (1.6 inches) | 4.376" (11.1 cm) |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | 9" (22.9 cm) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 6-pin |
Width | 110 mm (4.3 inches) | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 10.0 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 384 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 38.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA |