AMD Radeon RX 6600 vs AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6600 and AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- Around 74% lower typical power consumption: 132 Watt vs 230 Watt
- Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 290.312 vs 197.183
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19713 vs 15315
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 26778 vs 18062
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 69225 vs 50772
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19713 vs 15315
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 26778 vs 18062
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 69225 vs 50772
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 Oct 2021 vs 3 Mar 2021 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 132 Watt vs 230 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 290.312 vs 197.183 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19713 vs 15315 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 26778 vs 18062 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 69225 vs 50772 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19713 vs 15315 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 26778 vs 18062 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 69225 vs 50772 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
- Around 43% higher core clock speed: 2321 MHz vs 1626 MHz
- Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 2581 MHz vs 2491 MHz
- Around 48% higher texture fill rate: 413.0 GTexel/s vs 279.0 GTexel/s
- Around 43% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 1792
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19824 vs 15097
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 946 vs 882
- Around 38% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 100473 vs 73020
- Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 349.422 vs 260.061
- Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7129.567 vs 5472.868
- Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 34.064 vs 20.421
- Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1699.337 vs 1152.228
- Around 63% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2435 vs 1492
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 2321 MHz vs 1626 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2581 MHz vs 2491 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 413.0 GTexel/s vs 279.0 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 1792 |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19824 vs 15097 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 946 vs 882 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 100473 vs 73020 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 349.422 vs 260.061 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7129.567 vs 5472.868 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 34.064 vs 20.421 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1699.337 vs 1152.228 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2435 vs 1492 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6600
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6600 | AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15097 | 19824 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 882 | 946 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 73020 | 100473 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 260.061 | 349.422 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5472.868 | 7129.567 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 20.421 | 34.064 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 290.312 | 197.183 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1152.228 | 1699.337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19713 | 15315 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 26778 | 18062 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 69225 | 50772 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19713 | 15315 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 26778 | 18062 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 69225 | 50772 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1492 | 2435 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6600 | AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
Code name | Navi 23 XL | Navi 22 |
Launch date | 13 Oct 2021 | 3 Mar 2021 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $329 | $479 |
Place in performance rating | 38 | 51 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2491 MHz | 2581 MHz |
Compute units | 28 | 40 |
Core clock speed | 1626 MHz | 2321 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 7 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 558.0 GFLOPS (1:16) | 825.9 GFLOPS (1:16) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 17.86 TFLOPS (2:1) | 26.43 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.928 TFLOPS | 13.21 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 1792 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 159.4 GPixel/s | 165.2 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 279.0 GTexel/s | 413.0 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 132 Watt | 230 Watt |
Transistor count | 11060 million | 17200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort count | 3 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Height | 40 mm (1.6 inches) | 40 mm (1.6 inches) |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | 267 mm (10.5 inches) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | 550 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Width | 110 mm (4.3 inches) | 110 mm (4.3 inches) |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 384 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 192 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |