AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
• Around 66% higher core clock speed: 2321 MHz vs 1395 MHz
• Around 52% higher boost clock speed: 2581 MHz vs 1695 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
• Around 52% lower typical power consumption: 230 Watt vs 350 Watt
• Around 64% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
• 4.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 18062 vs 3713
• 15.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 50772 vs 3354
• 4.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 18062 vs 3713
• 15.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 50772 vs 3354

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

• Around 35% higher texture fill rate: 556.0 GTexel/s vs 413.0 GTexel/s
• 4.1x more pipelines: 10496 vs 2560
• 2x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 12 GB
• Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26668 vs 19824
• Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1060 vs 946
• Around 90% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 191142 vs 100473
• Around 98% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 690.619 vs 349.422
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7585.258 vs 7129.567
• Around 84% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 62.614 vs 34.064
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 209.424 vs 197.183
• Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2441.384 vs 1699.337
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 33398 vs 15315
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 33398 vs 15315
• 2.1x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5118 vs 2435

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	19824 26668
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	946 1060
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	100473 191142
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	349.422 690.619
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7129.567 7585.258
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	34.064 62.614
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	197.183 209.424
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1699.337 2441.384
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15315 33398
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18062 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	50772 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15315 33398
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18062 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	50772 3354
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	2435 5118

Compare specifications (specs)