AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
• Around 66% higher core clock speed: 2321 MHz vs 1395 MHz
• Around 52% higher boost clock speed: 2581 MHz vs 1695 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
• Around 52% lower typical power consumption: 230 Watt vs 350 Watt
• Around 64% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
• Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7129.567 vs 5528.565
• 4.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 18062 vs 3713
• 15.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 50772 vs 3354
• 4.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 18062 vs 3713
• 15.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 50772 vs 3354

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

• Around 35% higher texture fill rate: 556.0 GTexel/s vs 413.0 GTexel/s
• 4.1x more pipelines: 10496 vs 2560
• 2x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 12 GB
• Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26721 vs 19867
• Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1050 vs 941
• Around 92% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 191323 vs 99597
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 711.408 vs 349.422
• Around 84% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 62.812 vs 34.064
• Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 228.496 vs 197.183
• Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2431.277 vs 1699.337
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 33398 vs 15315
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 33398 vs 15315
• Around 56% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 19948 vs 12786

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	19867 26721
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	941 1050
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	99597 191323
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	349.422 711.408
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7129.567 5528.565
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	34.064 62.812
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	197.183 228.496
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1699.337 2431.277
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15315 33398
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18062 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	50772 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15315 33398
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18062 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	50772 3354
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	12786 19948

Compare specifications (specs)