AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
• Around 66% higher core clock speed: 2321 MHz vs 1395 MHz
• Around 52% higher boost clock speed: 2581 MHz vs 1695 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
• Around 52% lower typical power consumption: 230 Watt vs 350 Watt
• Around 64% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
• 4.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 18062 vs 3713
• 15.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 50772 vs 3354
• 4.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 18062 vs 3713
• 15.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 50772 vs 3354

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

• Around 35% higher texture fill rate: 556.0 GTexel/s vs 413.0 GTexel/s
• 4.1x more pipelines: 10496 vs 2560
• 2x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 12 GB
• Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26815 vs 19885
• Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1051 vs 941
• Around 94% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 188320 vs 97106
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 732.196 vs 349.422
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7585.258 vs 7129.567
• Around 85% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 63.011 vs 34.064
• Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 247.569 vs 197.183
• Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2441.384 vs 1699.337
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 33398 vs 15315
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 33398 vs 15315
• Around 56% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 19877 vs 12774

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	19885 26815
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	941 1051
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	97106 188320
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	349.422 732.196
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7129.567 7585.258
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	34.064 63.011
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	197.183 247.569
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1699.337 2441.384
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15315 33398
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18062 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	50772 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15315 33398
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18062 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	50772 3354
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	12774 19877

Compare specifications (specs)