AMD Radeon RX 6700M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6700M and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6700M
- Around 32% higher boost clock speed: 2250 MHz vs 1710 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 19% lower typical power consumption: 180 Watt vs 215 Watt
| Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz vs 1710 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt vs 215 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
- Around 2% higher core clock speed: 1515 MHz vs 1489 MHz
- Around 28% higher pipelines: 2944 vs 2304
- 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
- Around 58% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 905 vs 573
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18798 vs 13549
- Around 34% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 103974 vs 77407
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25500 vs 16145
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25500 vs 16145
- Around 15% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10935 vs 9503
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1515 MHz vs 1489 MHz |
| Pipelines | 2944 vs 2304 |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 905 vs 573 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 18798 vs 13549 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 103974 vs 77407 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25500 vs 16145 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25500 vs 16145 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10935 vs 9503 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6700M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 6700M | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 573 | 905 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13549 | 18798 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 77407 | 103974 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16145 | 25500 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16145 | 25500 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9503 | 10935 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 326.494 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3938.377 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.684 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 159.275 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1506.874 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6966 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6293 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6966 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6293 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 6700M | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
| Code name | Navi 22 | TU104 |
| Place in performance rating | 102 | 100 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch date | 20 September 2018 | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
| Price now | $749.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 32.34 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz | 1710 MHz |
| Compute units | 36 | |
| Core clock speed | 1489 MHz | 1515 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 648.0 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.74 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.37 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 2944 |
| Pixel fill rate | 144.0 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 324.0 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 215 Watt |
| Transistor count | 17200 million | 13,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 10 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 160 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 6700M with others
AMDRadeon RX 6700M vs
NVIDIAQuadro GV100
AMDRadeon RX 6700M vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 8000
AMDRadeon RX 6700M vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080
AMDRadeon RX 6700M vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
AMDRadeon RX 6700M vs
NVIDIARTX A4000
AMDRadeon RX 6700M vs
NVIDIAA30
