AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT vs AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT and AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 2.9x more core clock speed: 1825 MHz vs 625 MHz
- 129600x more texture fill rate: 648.0 GTexel/s vs 5 GTexel / s
- 28.8x more pipelines: 4608 vs 160
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 40 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1334 MHz
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3720 vs 1681
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3374 vs 3290
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3720 vs 1681
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3374 vs 3290
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 28 Oct 2020 vs 21 December 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1825 MHz vs 625 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 648.0 GTexel/s vs 5 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 4608 vs 160 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1334 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 vs 1681 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3374 vs 3290 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 vs 1681 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3374 vs 3290 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM
- 15.8x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 300 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT | AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 25004 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1025 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 154220 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 578.52 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 52.561 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 291.971 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2700.97 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16849 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 1681 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3374 | 3290 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16849 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 1681 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3374 | 3290 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3689 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT | AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | Navi 21 | Caicos |
| Launch date | 28 Oct 2020 | 21 December 2013 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | |
| Place in performance rating | 71 | 1127 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz | |
| Compute units | 72 | |
| Core clock speed | 1825 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 40 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1296 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 41.47 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 20.74 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 4608 | 160 |
| Pixel fill rate | 288.0 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 648.0 GTexel/s | 5 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 19 Watt |
| Transistor count | 26800 million | 370 million |
| Floating-point performance | 200.0 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Height | 50 mm (2 inches) | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 168 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | None |
| Width | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | 10.67 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 1334 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | DDR3 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT with others
AMDRadeon RX 6800 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2
AMDRadeon RX 6800 XT vs
AMDRadeon Pro V520
AMDRadeon RX 6800 XT vs
NVIDIARTX A5000
AMDRadeon RX 6800 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 12GB GA104
AMDRadeon RX 6800 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
AMDRadeon RX 6800 XT vs
NVIDIARTX A1000 Embedded
