AMD Radeon RX 6800 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6800 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6800

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
• Around 13% higher core clock speed: 1700 MHz vs 1500 MHz
• Around 22% higher boost clock speed: 2105 MHz vs 1725 MHz
• Around 59% higher texture fill rate: 505.2 GTexel/s vs 317.4 GTexel/s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
• Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
• Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 129479 vs 123479
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.585 vs 40.757
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 383.037 vs 182.055
• Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2280.457 vs 1664.554
• Around 1% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3188 vs 3163

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

• Around 53% higher pipelines: 5888 vs 3840
• Around 14% lower typical power consumption: 220 Watt vs 250 Watt
• Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 22253 vs 22131
• Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 999 vs 988
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 453.922 vs 432.118
• Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 31716 vs 16162
• 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13566 vs 3719
• 9.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 31930 vs 3373
• Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 31716 vs 16162
• 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13566 vs 3719
• 9.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 31930 vs 3373

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6800
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	22131 22253
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	988 999
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	129479 123479
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	432.118 453.922
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	41.585 40.757
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	383.037 182.055
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2280.457 1664.554
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16162 31716
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3719 13566
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3373 31930
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16162 31716
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3719 13566
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3373 31930
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3188 3163

Compare specifications (specs)