AMD Radeon RX 6800 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6800 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6800

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
• Around 22% higher core clock speed: 1700 MHz vs 1395 MHz
• Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 2105 MHz vs 1695 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
• Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 350 Watt
• Around 64% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
• Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 383.037 vs 247.569
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3373 vs 3354
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3373 vs 3354

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

• Around 10% higher texture fill rate: 556.0 GTexel/s vs 505.2 GTexel/s
• 2.7x more pipelines: 10496 vs 3840
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 16 GB
• Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26815 vs 22313
• Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1051 vs 973
• Around 49% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 188320 vs 126207
• Around 69% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 732.196 vs 432.118
• Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 63.011 vs 41.585
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2441.384 vs 2280.457
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 33398 vs 16162
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 33398 vs 16162
• Around 22% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 19877 vs 16306

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6800
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	22313 26815
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	973 1051
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	126207 188320
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	432.118 732.196
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	41.585 63.011
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	383.037 247.569
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2280.457 2441.384
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16162 33398
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3719 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3373 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16162 33398
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3719 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3373 3354
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	16306 19877

Compare specifications (specs)