AMD Radeon RX 6800 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6800 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6800
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 22% higher core clock speed: 1700 MHz vs 1395 MHz
- Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 2105 MHz vs 1695 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Around 64% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1049 vs 983
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 28 Oct 2020 vs 1 Sep 2020 |
| Core clock speed | 1700 MHz vs 1395 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2105 MHz vs 1695 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 8 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 350 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1049 vs 983 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
- Around 10% higher texture fill rate: 556.0 GTexel/s vs 505.2 GTexel/s
- 2.7x more pipelines: 10496 vs 3840
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 16 GB
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 25643 vs 21044
- Around 61% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 205415 vs 127776
- Around 31% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 19930 vs 15194
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 556.0 GTexel/s vs 505.2 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 10496 vs 3840 |
| Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 16 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 25643 vs 21044 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 205415 vs 127776 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19930 vs 15194 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6800
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 6800 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 21044 | 25643 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1049 | 983 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 127776 | 205415 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 432.118 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.585 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 383.037 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2280.457 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16938 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8914 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5706 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16938 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8914 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5706 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 15194 | 19930 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
| Code name | Navi 21 | GA102 |
| Launch date | 28 Oct 2020 | 1 Sep 2020 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $579 | $1499 |
| Place in performance rating | 9 | 1 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2105 MHz | 1695 MHz |
| Compute units | 60 | |
| Core clock speed | 1700 MHz | 1395 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 8 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1010 GFLOPS (1:16) | 556.0 GFLOPS (1:64) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 32.33 TFLOPS (2:1) | 35.58 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.17 TFLOPS | 35.58 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 3840 | 10496 |
| Pixel fill rate | 202.1 GPixel/s | 189.8 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 505.2 GTexel/s | 556.0 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Transistor count | 26800 million | 28300 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Height | 40 mm (1.6 inches) | 138 mm (5.4 inches) |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 313 mm (12.3 inches) |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | 750 Watt |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 12-pin |
| Width | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | Triple-slot |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 24 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | 936.2 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 384 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 6800 with others
AMDRadeon RX 6800 vs
NVIDIATesla T10 Processor
AMDRadeon RX 6800 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Ti
AMDRadeon RX 6800 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060
AMDRadeon RX 6800 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
AMDRadeon RX 6800 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT
AMDRadeon RX 6800 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Laptop
