AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- Around 19% higher core clock speed: 1825 MHz vs 1530 MHz
- Around 30% higher boost clock speed: 2250 MHz vs 1725 MHz
- 5.2x more texture fill rate: 720.0 GTexel/s vs 138.0 GTexel/s
- 4x more pipelines: 5120 vs 1280
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 4 GB
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26746 vs 10180
- Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1052 vs 751
- 3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 166557 vs 55838
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 543.753 vs 178.014
- 4.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 51.155 vs 11.169
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 320.733 vs 109.29
- 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2566.9 vs 787.025
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17213 vs 13569
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17213 vs 13569
- 59.9x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 21090 vs 352
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 28 Oct 2020 vs 22 Nov 2019 |
Core clock speed | 1825 MHz vs 1530 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz vs 1725 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 720.0 GTexel/s vs 138.0 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 5120 vs 1280 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26746 vs 10180 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1052 vs 751 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 166557 vs 55838 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 543.753 vs 178.014 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.155 vs 11.169 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 320.733 vs 109.29 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2566.9 vs 787.025 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17213 vs 13569 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17213 vs 13569 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 21090 vs 352 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 300 Watt
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3350 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26746 | 10180 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1052 | 751 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 166557 | 55838 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 543.753 | 178.014 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 0 | 1961.932 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.155 | 11.169 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 320.733 | 109.29 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2566.9 | 787.025 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17213 | 13569 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17213 | 13569 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 21090 | 352 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
Code name | Navi 21 | TU116 |
Launch date | 28 Oct 2020 | 22 Nov 2019 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
Place in performance rating | 62 | 283 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz | 1725 MHz |
Compute units | 80 | |
Core clock speed | 1825 MHz | 1530 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1440 GFLOPS (1:16) | 138.0 GFLOPS (1:32) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 46.08 TFLOPS (2:1) | 8.832 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 23.04 TFLOPS | 4.416 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 5120 | 1280 |
Pixel fill rate | 288.0 GPixel/s | 55.20 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 720.0 GTexel/s | 138.0 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 26800 million | 6600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1xDVI, 1xHDMI, 1xDisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Triple-slot | |
Height | 50 mm (2 inches) | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 9 inches (229 mm) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | 350 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Width | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | Dual-slot |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | 192 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |