AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 19% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1825 MHz versus 1530 MHz
- Environ 30% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 2250 MHz versus 1725 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 720.0 GTexel/s versus 138.0 GTexel/s
- 4x plus de pipelines: 5120 versus 1280
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 12 nm
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 4 GB
- 2.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 26746 versus 10180
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1052 versus 751
- 3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 166557 versus 55838
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 543.753 versus 178.014
- 4.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 51.155 versus 11.169
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 320.733 versus 109.29
- 3.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2566.9 versus 787.025
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17213 versus 13569
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17213 versus 13569
- 59.9x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 21090 versus 352
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 28 Oct 2020 versus 22 Nov 2019 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1825 MHz versus 1530 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 2250 MHz versus 1725 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 720.0 GTexel/s versus 138.0 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 5120 versus 1280 |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 12 nm |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 4 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 26746 versus 10180 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1052 versus 751 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 166557 versus 55838 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 543.753 versus 178.014 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.155 versus 11.169 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 320.733 versus 109.29 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2566.9 versus 787.025 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17213 versus 13569 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17213 versus 13569 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 21090 versus 352 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- 3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 100 Watt versus 300 Watt
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt versus 300 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 versus 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 versus 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3350 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 26746 | 10180 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1052 | 751 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 166557 | 55838 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 543.753 | 178.014 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 0 | 1961.932 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.155 | 11.169 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 320.733 | 109.29 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2566.9 | 787.025 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17213 | 13569 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17213 | 13569 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 21090 | 352 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
| Nom de code | Navi 21 | TU116 |
| Date de sortie | 28 Oct 2020 | 22 Nov 2019 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $999 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 62 | 283 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 2250 MHz | 1725 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 80 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1825 MHz | 1530 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1440 GFLOPS (1:16) | 138.0 GFLOPS (1:32) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 46.08 TFLOPS (2:1) | 8.832 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 23.04 TFLOPS | 4.416 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 5120 | 1280 |
| Pixel fill rate | 288.0 GPixel/s | 55.20 GPixel/s |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 720.0 GTexel/s | 138.0 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 26800 million | 6600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1xDVI, 1xHDMI, 1xDisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Facteur de forme | Triple-slot | |
| Hauteur | 50 mm (2 inches) | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 9 inches (229 mm) |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 700 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Largeur | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | Dual-slot |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 16 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 512 GB/s | 192 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 128 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT avec des autres
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Ti
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6600
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
NVIDIAA10G
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
NVIDIARTX 3500 Ada Generation
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
AMDRadeon RX 7600M
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
AMDRadeon PRO W7600
