AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 22% higher core clock speed: 1825 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- Around 30% higher boost clock speed: 2250 MHz vs 1725 MHz
- 2.3x more texture fill rate: 720.0 GTexel/s vs 317.4 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26853 vs 22409
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1048 vs 999
- Around 29% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 161048 vs 124865
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 543.753 vs 452.561
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 51.155 vs 40.794
- Around 74% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 320.733 vs 184.548
- Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2566.9 vs 1634.218
- Around 54% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 20909 vs 13611
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 28 Oct 2020 vs 1 Sep 2020 |
Core clock speed | 1825 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz vs 1725 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 720.0 GTexel/s vs 317.4 GTexel/s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 8 nm |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26853 vs 22409 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1048 vs 999 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 161048 vs 124865 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 543.753 vs 452.561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.155 vs 40.794 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 320.733 vs 184.548 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2566.9 vs 1634.218 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 20909 vs 13611 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
- Around 15% higher pipelines: 5888 vs 5120
- Around 36% lower typical power consumption: 220 Watt vs 300 Watt
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 31716 vs 17213
- 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13566 vs 3714
- 9.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 31930 vs 3350
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 31716 vs 17213
- 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13566 vs 3714
- 9.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 31930 vs 3350
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 5888 vs 5120 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 220 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31716 vs 17213 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13566 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 31930 vs 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31716 vs 17213 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13566 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 31930 vs 3350 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26853 | 22409 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1048 | 999 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 161048 | 124865 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 543.753 | 452.561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 0 | 5803.174 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.155 | 40.794 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 320.733 | 184.548 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2566.9 | 1634.218 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17213 | 31716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 13566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 31930 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17213 | 31716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 13566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 31930 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 20909 | 13611 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
Code name | Navi 21 | GA104 |
Launch date | 28 Oct 2020 | 1 Sep 2020 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | $499 |
Place in performance rating | 70 | 41 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz | 1725 MHz |
Compute units | 80 | |
Core clock speed | 1825 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1440 GFLOPS (1:16) | 317.4 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 46.08 TFLOPS (2:1) | 20.31 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 23.04 TFLOPS | 20.31 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 5120 | 5888 |
Pixel fill rate | 288.0 GPixel/s | 165.6 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 720.0 GTexel/s | 317.4 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 220 Watt |
Transistor count | 26800 million | 17400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Triple-slot | Dual-slot |
Height | 50 mm (2 inches) | 112 mm (4.4 inches) |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 242 mm, 9.5 inches |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | 550 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Width | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | 112 mm, 4.4 inches |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | 448.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |