AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 22% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1825 MHz versus 1500 MHz
- Environ 30% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 2250 MHz versus 1725 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 720.0 GTexel/s versus 317.4 GTexel/s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 8 nm
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 8 GB
- Environ 14% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) versus 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 26856 versus 22410
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1048 versus 999
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 161042 versus 124891
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 543.753 versus 452.561
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 51.155 versus 40.794
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 320.733 versus 184.548
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2566.9 versus 1634.218
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 20909 versus 13611
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 28 Oct 2020 versus 1 Sep 2020 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1825 MHz versus 1500 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 2250 MHz versus 1725 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 720.0 GTexel/s versus 317.4 GTexel/s |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 8 nm |
Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 8 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) versus 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26856 versus 22410 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1048 versus 999 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 161042 versus 124891 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 543.753 versus 452.561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.155 versus 40.794 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 320.733 versus 184.548 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2566.9 versus 1634.218 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 20909 versus 13611 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
- Environ 15% de pipelines plus haut: 5888 versus 5120
- Environ 36% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 220 Watt versus 300 Watt
- Environ 84% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 31716 versus 17213
- 3.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13566 versus 3714
- 9.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 31930 versus 3350
- Environ 84% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 31716 versus 17213
- 3.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13566 versus 3714
- 9.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 31930 versus 3350
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 5888 versus 5120 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 220 Watt versus 300 Watt |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31716 versus 17213 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13566 versus 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 31930 versus 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31716 versus 17213 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13566 versus 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 31930 versus 3350 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26856 | 22410 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1048 | 999 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 161042 | 124891 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 543.753 | 452.561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 0 | 5803.174 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.155 | 40.794 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 320.733 | 184.548 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2566.9 | 1634.218 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17213 | 31716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 13566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 31930 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17213 | 31716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 13566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 31930 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 20909 | 13611 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
Nom de code | Navi 21 | GA104 |
Date de sortie | 28 Oct 2020 | 1 Sep 2020 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $999 | $499 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 70 | 41 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 2250 MHz | 1725 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 80 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1825 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1440 GFLOPS (1:16) | 317.4 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 46.08 TFLOPS (2:1) | 20.31 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 23.04 TFLOPS | 20.31 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 5120 | 5888 |
Pixel fill rate | 288.0 GPixel/s | 165.6 GPixel/s |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 720.0 GTexel/s | 317.4 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 220 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 26800 million | 17400 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Triple-slot | Dual-slot |
Hauteur | 50 mm (2 inches) | 112 mm (4.4 inches) |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 242 mm, 9.5 inches |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 700 Watt | 550 Watt |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 8-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Largeur | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | 112 mm, 4.4 inches |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 512 GB/s | 448.0 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |