AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 85% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 120 Watt
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 54.784 vs 21.766
- Around 32% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1201 vs 907
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 February 2018 vs 19 July 2016 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 120 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 54.784 vs 21.766 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1201 vs 907 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
- 5x more core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 38% higher boost clock speed: 1709 MHz vs 1240 MHz
- 2.5x more texture fill rate: 136.7 GTexel / s vs 55 GTexel / s
- Around 82% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 704
- 2.5x better floating-point performance: 4,375 gflops vs 1,760 gflops
- 4.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10079 vs 2106
- Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 747 vs 518
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 35369 vs 14583
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 119.148 vs 40.991
- 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1373.562 vs 364.578
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.694 vs 3.196
- Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 454.799 vs 262.35
- 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12442 vs 3455
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3691 vs 1857
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 3107
- 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12442 vs 3455
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3691 vs 1857
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 3107
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1709 MHz vs 1240 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 136.7 GTexel / s vs 55 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 704 |
Floating-point performance | 4,375 gflops vs 1,760 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10079 vs 2106 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 747 vs 518 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 35369 vs 14583 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 119.148 vs 40.991 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1373.562 vs 364.578 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.694 vs 3.196 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 454.799 vs 262.35 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12442 vs 3455 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 vs 1857 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 vs 3107 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12442 vs 3455 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 vs 1857 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 vs 3107 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2106 | 10079 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 518 | 747 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14583 | 35369 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.991 | 119.148 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 364.578 | 1373.562 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.196 | 8.694 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 54.784 | 21.766 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 262.35 | 454.799 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3455 | 12442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1857 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3107 | 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3455 | 12442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1857 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3107 | 3340 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1201 | 907 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Raven | GP106 |
Launch date | 13 February 2018 | 19 July 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 795 | 356 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1240 MHz | 1709 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,760 gflops | 4,375 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 704 | 1280 |
Texture fill rate | 55 GTexel / s | 136.7 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 120 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,940 million | 4,400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Length | 250 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Shared memory | 0 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 |