AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 16 nm
- Environ 85% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 65 Watt versus 120 Watt
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 54.784 versus 21.766
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1201 versus 907
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 13 February 2018 versus 19 July 2016 |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt versus 120 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 54.784 versus 21.766 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1201 versus 907 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
- 5x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1506 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 38% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1709 MHz versus 1240 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 136.7 GTexel / s versus 55 GTexel / s
- Environ 82% de pipelines plus haut: 1280 versus 704
- 2.5x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 4,375 gflops versus 1,760 gflops
- 4.8x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 10079 versus 2106
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 747 versus 518
- 2.4x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 35369 versus 14583
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 119.148 versus 40.991
- 3.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1373.562 versus 364.578
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.694 versus 3.196
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 454.799 versus 262.35
- 3.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12442 versus 3455
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3691 versus 1857
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 versus 3107
- 3.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12442 versus 3455
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3691 versus 1857
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 versus 3107
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1506 MHz versus 300 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1709 MHz versus 1240 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 136.7 GTexel / s versus 55 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1280 versus 704 |
Performance á point flottant | 4,375 gflops versus 1,760 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10079 versus 2106 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 747 versus 518 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 35369 versus 14583 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 119.148 versus 40.991 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1373.562 versus 364.578 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.694 versus 3.196 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 454.799 versus 262.35 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12442 versus 3455 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 versus 1857 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 versus 3107 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12442 versus 3455 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 versus 1857 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 versus 3107 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2106 | 10079 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 518 | 747 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14583 | 35369 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.991 | 119.148 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 364.578 | 1373.562 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.196 | 8.694 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 54.784 | 21.766 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 262.35 | 454.799 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3455 | 12442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1857 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3107 | 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3455 | 12442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1857 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3107 | 3340 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1201 | 907 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Pascal |
Nom de code | Raven | GP106 |
Date de sortie | 13 February 2018 | 19 July 2016 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 795 | 356 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $299 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1240 MHz | 1709 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1,760 gflops | 4,375 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 704 | 1280 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 55 GTexel / s | 136.7 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 120 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 4,940 million | 4,400 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin |
Longeur | 250 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
RAM maximale | 6 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.2 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8008 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 |