AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 and NVIDIA Quadro K2200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 11

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1240 MHz vs 1124 MHz
• Around 22% higher texture fill rate: 55 GTexel / s vs 44.96 GTexel / s
• Around 10% higher pipelines: 704 vs 640
• Around 22% better floating-point performance: 1,760 gflops vs 1,439 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 5% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 68 Watt
• Around 21% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14582 vs 12020
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 40.991 vs 40.695
• Around 80% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 54.784 vs 30.455
• Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 262.35 vs 166.26
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1857 vs 1577
• Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3107 vs 1671
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1857 vs 1577
• Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3107 vs 1671
• Around 1% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1201 vs 1193

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2200

• 3.5x more core clock speed: 1046 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 70% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3572 vs 2107
• Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 547 vs 519
• Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 588.094 vs 364.578
• Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4921 vs 3455
• Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4921 vs 3455

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2200

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2107 3572
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	519 547
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	14582 12020
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	40.991 40.695
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	364.578 588.094
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.196 3.205
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	54.784 30.455
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	262.35 166.26
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3455 4921
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1857 1577
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3107 1671
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3455 4921
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1857 1577
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3107 1671
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	1201 1193

Compare specifications (specs)