AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1240 MHz vs 1150 MHz
- 14.7x more pipelines: 704 vs 48
- Around 99% better floating-point performance: 1,760 gflops vs 883.2 gflops
- Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2108 vs 1473
- 3.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14576 vs 4507
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3455 vs 2475
- Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1857 vs 958
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3107 vs 2304
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3455 vs 2475
- Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1857 vs 958
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3107 vs 2304
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 February 2018 vs 5 September 2014 |
Boost clock speed | 1240 MHz vs 1150 MHz |
Pipelines | 704 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 1,760 gflops vs 883.2 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2108 vs 1473 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14576 vs 4507 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3455 vs 2475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1857 vs 958 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3107 vs 2304 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3455 vs 2475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1857 vs 958 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3107 vs 2304 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 564 vs 520
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 55.2 GTexel / s vs 55 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 564 vs 520 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2108 | 1473 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 520 | 564 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14576 | 4507 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.991 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 364.578 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.196 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 54.784 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 262.35 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3455 | 2475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1857 | 958 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3107 | 2304 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3455 | 2475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1857 | 958 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3107 | 2304 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1201 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Generation 8.0 |
Code name | Raven | Broadwell GT3e |
Launch date | 13 February 2018 | 5 September 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 799 | 800 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1240 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,760 gflops | 883.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 704 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 55 GTexel / s | 55.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,940 million | 189 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Shared memory | 0 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |