AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH

NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
Around 6% higher core clock speed: 1063 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1190 MHz vs 1075 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
2.5x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 250 Watt
228.6x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
2.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2911 vs 1229

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	1 February 2018 vs 17 March 2015
Core clock speed	1063 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Boost clock speed	1190 MHz vs 1075 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	100 Watt vs 250 Watt
Memory clock speed	1600 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3714 vs 3700
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3351 vs 3343
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3714 vs 3700
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3351 vs 3343
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	2911 vs 1229

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X

Around 68% higher texture fill rate: 192 billion / sec vs 114.2 GTexel / s
2x more pipelines: 3072 vs 1536
Around 83% better floating-point performance: 6,691 gflops vs 3,656 gflops
3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB
Around 96% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12868 vs 6579
Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 834 vs 774
Around 52% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 41155 vs 27105
Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9834 vs 8931
Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9834 vs 8931

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	192 billion / sec vs 114.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines	3072 vs 1536
Floating-point performance	6,691 gflops vs 3,656 gflops
Maximum memory size	12 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	12868 vs 6579
PassMark - G2D Mark	834 vs 774
Geekbench - OpenCL	41155 vs 27105
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9834 vs 8931
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9834 vs 8931

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

6579

12868

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

774

834

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

27105

41155

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8931

9834

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3714

3700

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3351

3343

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8931

9834

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3714

3700

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3351

3343

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

2911

1229

Name	AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH	NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
PassMark - G3D Mark	6579	12868
PassMark - G2D Mark	774	834
Geekbench - OpenCL	27105	41155
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	8931	9834
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3714	3700
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3351	3343
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	8931	9834
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3714	3700
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3351	3343
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	2911	1229
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		157.231
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1722.566
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		12.245
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		38.225
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		518.554

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH	NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	Polaris 22	GM200
Launch date	1 February 2018	17 March 2015
Place in performance rating	330	332
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$999
Price now		$1,999.99
Value for money (0-100)		7.38
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1190 MHz	1075 MHz
Core clock speed	1063 MHz	1000 MHz
Floating-point performance	3,656 gflops	6,691 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	1536	3072
Texture fill rate	114.2 GTexel / s	192 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	100 Watt	250 Watt
CUDA cores		3072
Transistor count		8,000 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
HDCP
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	IGP	PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
Height		4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length		10.5" (26.7 cm)
Recommended system power (PSU)		600 Watt
SLI options		4x
Supplementary power connectors		6-pin + 8-pin
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	12 GB
Memory bandwidth	204.8 GB / s	336.5 GB / s
Memory clock speed	1600 MHz	7.0 GB/s
Memory type	HBM2	GDDR5
Shared memory	0
Memory bus width		384 Bit
Technologies
CUDA
GameStream
GameWorks
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost