AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 39% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 80.88 GTexel / s versus 58.2 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 1280 versus 640
- Environ 39% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,588 gflops versus 1,862 gflops
- Environ 15% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 65 Watt versus 75 Watt
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 461 versus 457
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 19490 versus 17466
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1235.247 versus 799.414
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.195 versus 4.536
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 75.289 versus 30.523
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 252.311 versus 223.683
- 17.1x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2091 versus 122
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 February 2018 versus 25 October 2016 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 80.88 GTexel / s versus 58.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1280 versus 640 |
Performance á point flottant | 2,588 gflops versus 1,862 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt versus 75 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 461 versus 457 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 19490 versus 17466 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1235.247 versus 799.414 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.195 versus 4.536 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 75.289 versus 30.523 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 252.311 versus 223.683 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2091 versus 122 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
- Environ 39% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1290 MHz versus 931 MHz
- Environ 38% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1392 MHz versus 1011 MHz
- 5x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 7008 MHz versus 1400 MHz
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 5029 versus 3880
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 67.209 versus 58.971
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7043 versus 6318
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 versus 2070
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 versus 1514
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7043 versus 6318
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 versus 2070
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 versus 1514
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1290 MHz versus 931 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1392 MHz versus 1011 MHz |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7008 MHz versus 1400 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5029 versus 3880 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.209 versus 58.971 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7043 versus 6318 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 versus 2070 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 versus 1514 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7043 versus 6318 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 versus 2070 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 versus 1514 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3880 | 5029 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 461 | 457 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 19490 | 17466 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 58.971 | 67.209 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1235.247 | 799.414 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.195 | 4.536 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 75.289 | 30.523 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 252.311 | 223.683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6318 | 7043 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2070 | 3685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1514 | 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6318 | 7043 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2070 | 3685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1514 | 3360 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2091 | 122 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
Nom de code | Polaris 22 | GP107 |
Date de sortie | 1 February 2018 | 25 October 2016 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 589 | 586 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $109 | |
Prix maintenant | $124.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 56.95 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1011 MHz | 1392 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 931 MHz | 1290 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 2,588 gflops | 1,862 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 1280 | 640 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 80.88 GTexel / s | 58.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 75 Watt |
Noyaux CUDA | 640 | |
Température maximale du GPU | 97 °C | |
Compte de transistor | 3,300 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, DP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Largeur | 2-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 204.8 GB / s | 112 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 1024 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1400 MHz | 7008 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
VR Ready |