AMD Radeon Vega 11 vs NVIDIA GeForce4 448 Go
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 11 and NVIDIA GeForce4 448 Go videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 11
- Videocard is newer: launch date 15 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 50% higher core clock speed: 300 MHz vs 200 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 150 nm
- 307.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1847 vs 6
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 484 vs 199
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 February 2018 vs 1 March 2002 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz vs 200 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 150 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1847 vs 6 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 484 vs 199 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce4 448 Go
- 14x more texture fill rate: 800 MTexel / s vs 57.2 GTexel / s
Texture fill rate | 800 MTexel / s vs 57.2 GTexel / s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 11
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce4 448 Go
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Vega 11 | NVIDIA GeForce4 448 Go |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1847 | 6 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 484 | 199 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13277 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.582 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 371.843 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.156 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.449 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 248.838 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2156 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2475 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2156 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2475 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Vega 11 | NVIDIA GeForce4 448 Go | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Celsius |
Code name | Owl | NV18 A4 |
Launch date | 13 February 2018 | 1 March 2002 |
Place in performance rating | 897 | 894 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 200 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,830 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 150 nm |
Pipelines | 704 | |
Texture fill rate | 57.2 GTexel / s | 800 MTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
Transistor count | 4,940 million | 29 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | AGP 8x |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory |
||
Memory type | System Shared | DDR |
Maximum RAM amount | 64 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 400 MHz | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 8.0 | |
OpenGL | 1.3 |