AMD Radeon Vega 3 vs ATI Radeon 9000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 3 and ATI Radeon 9000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 3
- Videocard is newer: launch date 15 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 20% higher core clock speed: 300 MHz vs 250 MHz
- 12x more texture fill rate: 12 GTexel / s vs 1 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 150 nm
- Around 87% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 28 Watt
- 222.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 890 vs 4
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 304 vs 123
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 February 2018 vs 1 July 2002 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz vs 250 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 12 GTexel / s vs 1 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 150 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 28 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 890 vs 4 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 304 vs 123 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 3
GPU 2: ATI Radeon 9000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Vega 3 | ATI Radeon 9000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 890 | 4 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 304 | 123 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3950 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.049 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 183.156 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.75 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.933 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 60.006 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1412 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2111 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3174 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1412 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2111 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3174 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 418 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Vega 3 | ATI Radeon 9000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Rage 7 |
Code name | Owl | RV250 |
Launch date | 13 February 2018 | 1 July 2002 |
Place in performance rating | 1261 | 1259 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 250 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 384.0 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 150 nm |
Pipelines | 192 | |
Texture fill rate | 12 GTexel / s | 1 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 28 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,940 million | 36 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | AGP 4x |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory |
||
Memory type | System Shared | DDR |
Maximum RAM amount | 64 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 400 MHz | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 8.1 | |
OpenGL | 1.4 |