AMD Radeon Vega 3 vs Intel UHD Graphics 620

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 3 and Intel UHD Graphics 620 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 3

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
  • 8x more pipelines: 192 vs 24
  • Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 303 vs 241
  • Around 88% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 60.006 vs 31.881
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1412 vs 1397
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2111 vs 878
  • Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3174 vs 2227
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1412 vs 1397
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2111 vs 878
  • Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3174 vs 2227
  • 6.7x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 418 vs 62
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 13 February 2018 vs 1 September 2017
Pipelines 192 vs 24
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 303 vs 241
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 60.006 vs 31.881
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1412 vs 1397
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2111 vs 878
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3174 vs 2227
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1412 vs 1397
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2111 vs 878
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3174 vs 2227
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 418 vs 62

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 620

  • Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1000 MHz
  • Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1042 vs 889
  • Around 16% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4592 vs 3963
  • 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.062 vs 10.049
  • Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 273.504 vs 183.156
  • 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.777 vs 0.75
  • Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.939 vs 18.933
Specifications (specs)
Boost clock speed 1150 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1042 vs 889
Geekbench - OpenCL 4592 vs 3963
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 27.062 vs 10.049
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 273.504 vs 183.156
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.777 vs 0.75
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 19.939 vs 18.933

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 3
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 620

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
889
1042
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
303
241
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
3963
4592
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
10.049
27.062
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
183.156
273.504
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
0.75
1.777
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
18.933
19.939
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
60.006
31.881
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1412
1397
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2111
878
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3174
2227
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1412
1397
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2111
878
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3174
2227
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
418
62
Name AMD Radeon Vega 3 Intel UHD Graphics 620
PassMark - G3D Mark 889 1042
PassMark - G2D Mark 303 241
Geekbench - OpenCL 3963 4592
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 10.049 27.062
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 183.156 273.504
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.75 1.777
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 18.933 19.939
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 60.006 31.881
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1412 1397
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2111 878
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3174 2227
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1412 1397
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2111 878
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3174 2227
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 418 62

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Vega 3 Intel UHD Graphics 620

Essentials

Architecture GCN 5.0 Generation 9.5
Code name Owl Kaby Lake GT2
Launch date 13 February 2018 1 September 2017
Place in performance rating 1267 1380
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1000 MHz 1150 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 300 MHz
Floating-point performance 384.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 14 nm
Pipelines 192 24
Texture fill rate 12 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 15 Watt
Transistor count 4,940 million 189 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface IGP PCIe 3.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors None

Memory

Memory type System Shared LPDDR3 / DDR4
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB
Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit
Shared memory 1

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL 4.5

Technologies

Quick Sync