AMD Radeon Vega 3 versus Intel UHD Graphics 620
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Vega 3 and Intel UHD Graphics 620 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Mémoire, Soutien API, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Vega 3
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 mois plus tard
- 8x plus de pipelines: 192 versus 24
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 303 versus 241
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 60.006 versus 31.881
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1412 versus 1397
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2111 versus 878
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3174 versus 2227
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1412 versus 1397
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2111 versus 878
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3174 versus 2227
- 6.7x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 418 versus 62
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 13 February 2018 versus 1 September 2017 |
Pipelines | 192 versus 24 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 303 versus 241 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 60.006 versus 31.881 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1412 versus 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2111 versus 878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3174 versus 2227 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1412 versus 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2111 versus 878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3174 versus 2227 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 418 versus 62 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 620
- Environ 15% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1150 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1042 versus 889
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4592 versus 3963
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.062 versus 10.049
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 273.504 versus 183.156
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.777 versus 0.75
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.939 versus 18.933
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1042 versus 889 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4592 versus 3963 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.062 versus 10.049 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 273.504 versus 183.156 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.777 versus 0.75 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.939 versus 18.933 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 3
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 620
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon Vega 3 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 889 | 1042 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 303 | 241 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3963 | 4592 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.049 | 27.062 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 183.156 | 273.504 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.75 | 1.777 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.933 | 19.939 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 60.006 | 31.881 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1412 | 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2111 | 878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3174 | 2227 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1412 | 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2111 | 878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3174 | 2227 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 418 | 62 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon Vega 3 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Generation 9.5 |
Nom de code | Owl | Kaby Lake GT2 |
Date de sortie | 13 February 2018 | 1 September 2017 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1267 | 1380 |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1000 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 384.0 gflops | |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 192 | 24 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 4,940 million | 189 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Mémoire |
||
Genre de mémoire | System Shared | LPDDR3 / DDR4 |
RAM maximale | 32 GB | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |