AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient vs Intel Iris Graphics 550
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient and Intel Iris Graphics 550 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1894 vs 1435
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 355 vs 304
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3170 vs 1290
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 3157
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3170 vs 1290
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 3157
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 April 2018 vs 1 September 2015 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1894 vs 1435 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 355 vs 304 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3170 vs 1290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 vs 3157 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3170 vs 1290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 3157 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Graphics 550
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2675 vs 2408
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2675 vs 2408
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2675 vs 2408 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2675 vs 2408 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
GPU 2: Intel Iris Graphics 550
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient | Intel Iris Graphics 550 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1894 | 1435 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 355 | 304 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.039 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 176.928 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.666 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.603 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 135.437 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2408 | 2675 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3170 | 1290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3157 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2408 | 2675 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3170 | 1290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3157 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 862 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7028 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient | Intel Iris Graphics 550 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Generation 9.0 |
Code name | Raven | Skylake GT3e |
Launch date | 23 April 2018 | 1 September 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 958 | 960 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,940 million | 189 million |
Pipelines | 48 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory type | eDRAM | |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |