AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
• Around 68% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8770 vs 5220
• Around 88% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.891 vs 13.806
• Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.104 vs 1.535
• Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 37.17 vs 27.524
• 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 132.07 vs 38.664
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1514 vs 1435
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6729 vs 3300
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1514 vs 1435
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6729 vs 3300

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM

• 2.7x more core clock speed: 824 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1882 vs 1582
• Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 431 vs 411
• Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 546.51 vs 365.4
• Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3531 vs 2433
• Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3531 vs 2433

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1582 1882
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	411 431
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	8770 5220
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25.891 13.806
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	365.4 546.51
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.104 1.535
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	37.17 27.524
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	132.07 38.664
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1514 1435
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2433 3531
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6729 3300
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1514 1435
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2433 3531
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6729 3300

Compare specifications (specs)