ATI FirePro V4800 vs ATI Radeon HD 5750

Comparative analysis of ATI FirePro V4800 and ATI Radeon HD 5750 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V4800

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
• Around 11% higher core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 700 MHz
• Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 69 Watt vs 86 Watt
• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1204 vs 1168
• Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 456 vs 338
• Around 61% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1671 vs 1039
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 56.777 vs 53.346
• Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2211 vs 1757
• Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2211 vs 1757

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5750

• Around 63% higher texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 15.5 GTexel / s
• Around 80% higher pipelines: 720 vs 400
• Around 63% better floating-point performance: 1,008.0 gflops vs 620.0 gflops
• Around 28% higher memory clock speed: 4600 MHz vs 3600 MHz
• Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 7.384 vs 5.886
• Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 460.31 vs 321.782
• Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.679 vs 0.529
• Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 23.118 vs 14.184
• Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2124 vs 1512
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3347 vs 3326
• Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2124 vs 1512
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3347 vs 3326

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: ATI FirePro V4800
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5750

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1204 1168
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	456 338
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1671 1039
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.886 7.384
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	321.782 460.31
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.529 0.679
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14.184 23.118
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	56.777 53.346
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1512 2124
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2211 1757
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3326 3347
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1512 2124
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2211 1757
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3326 3347

Compare specifications (specs)