ATI FirePro V8800 vs ATI Radeon HD 5970
Comparative analysis of ATI FirePro V8800 and ATI Radeon HD 5970 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V8800
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 825 MHz vs 725 MHz
- Around 44% lower typical power consumption: 208 Watt vs 300 Watt
- Around 15% higher memory clock speed: 4600 MHz vs 4000 MHz
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2281 vs 2263
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 445 vs 416
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3575 vs 3454
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3213
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3575 vs 3454
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3213
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 April 2010 vs 18 November 2009 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz vs 725 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 208 Watt vs 300 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz vs 4000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2281 vs 2263 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 445 vs 416 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3575 vs 3454 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3213 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3575 vs 3454 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3213 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5970
- 3.9x more texture fill rate: 2x 58.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 66.0 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 2x 1600 vs 1600
- Around 76% better floating-point performance: 2x 2,320.0 gflops vs 2,640.0 gflops
| Texture fill rate | 2x 58.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 66.0 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2x 1600 vs 1600 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 2,320.0 gflops vs 2,640.0 gflops |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI FirePro V8800
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5970
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | ATI FirePro V8800 | ATI Radeon HD 5970 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2281 | 2263 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 445 | 416 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 36751 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.27 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1180.667 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.357 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.357 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 228.843 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3575 | 3454 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3213 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3575 | 3454 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3213 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3977 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3977 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| ATI FirePro V8800 | ATI Radeon HD 5970 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | Cypress | Hemlock |
| Launch date | 7 April 2010 | 18 November 2009 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,499 | $699 |
| Place in performance rating | 693 | 605 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Design | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | 2x 2,320.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 1600 | 2x 1600 |
| Texture fill rate | 66.0 GTexel / s | 2x 58.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 208 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,154 million | 2,154 million |
| Boost clock speed | 725 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | 2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | 305 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB / s | 2x 128.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 2x 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare ATI FirePro V8800 with others
ATIFirePro V8800 vs
ATIRadeon X600 XT
ATIFirePro V8800 vs
ATIFireMV 2200
ATIFirePro V8800 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3850
ATIFirePro V8800 vs
NVIDIAQuadro 7000
ATIFirePro V8800 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 870M
ATIFirePro V8800 vs
NVIDIATesla K80m
