ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT
Comparative analysis of ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO and ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 8% lower typical power consumption: 200 Watt vs 215 Watt
Launch date | 12 December 2007 vs 14 May 2007 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt vs 215 Watt |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT
- Around 24% higher core clock speed: 743 MHz vs 600 MHz
- Around 24% higher texture fill rate: 11.89 GTexel / s vs 9.6 GTexel / s
- Around 24% better floating-point performance: 475.5 gflops vs 384.0 gflops
- Around 4% higher memory clock speed: 1656 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 660 vs 628
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 743 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 11.89 GTexel / s vs 9.6 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 475.5 gflops vs 384.0 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 1656 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 660 vs 628 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO | ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 628 | 660 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 397 | 397 |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO | ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale | TeraScale |
Code name | R600 | R600 |
Launch date | 12 December 2007 | 14 May 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 381 | 382 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 743 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 384.0 gflops | 475.5 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | 320 |
Texture fill rate | 9.6 GTexel / s | 11.89 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 215 Watt |
Transistor count | 720 million | 720 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | 241 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 118.4 GB / s | 106.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 512 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1656 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR4 | GDDR3 |