ATI Radeon HD 4770 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
Comparative analysis of ATI Radeon HD 4770 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4770
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 50% higher core clock speed: 750 MHz vs 500 MHz
- Around 50% higher texture fill rate: 24 GTexel / s vs 16 GTexel / s
- 6.7x more pipelines: 640 vs 96
- 6x better floating-point performance: 960.0 gflops vs 160 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 2x more memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- Around 92% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 898 vs 467
- 4.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8618 vs 1820
- 4.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8618 vs 1820
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 28 April 2009 vs 23 February 2008 |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 24 GTexel / s vs 16 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 640 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 960.0 gflops vs 160 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 898 vs 467 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8618 vs 1820 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8618 vs 1820 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
- Around 14% lower typical power consumption: 70 Watt vs 80 Watt
- 3.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 365 vs 97
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt vs 80 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 365 vs 97 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Radeon HD 4770
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | ATI Radeon HD 4770 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 898 | 467 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 97 | 365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8618 | 1820 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8618 | 1820 |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI Radeon HD 4770 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale | Tesla |
Code name | RV740 | G92 |
Launch date | 28 April 2009 | 23 February 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
Place in performance rating | 783 | 785 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 960.0 gflops | 160 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 24 GTexel / s | 16 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 70 Watt |
Transistor count | 826 million | 754 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-HE |
Length | 203 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB / s | 51.1 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Gigathread technology | ||
HDCP-capable | ||
HDR (High Dynamic-Range Lighting) | ||
PCI-E 16x | ||
PowerMizer 7.0 |