ATI Radeon HD 5470 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
Comparative analysis of ATI Radeon HD 5470 and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5470
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 5.6x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 106 Watt
| Launch date | 13 February 2012 vs 13 September 2010 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 106 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 1566 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 4.8x more texture fill rate: 25.1 billion / sec vs 5.2 GTexel / s
- 2.4x more pipelines: 192 vs 80
- 5.8x better floating-point performance: 601.3 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz vs 800 MHz
- 4.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1323 vs 268
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 303 vs 298
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3365 vs 960
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3365 vs 960
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3325 vs 1771
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3325 vs 1771
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1566 MHz vs 650 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 25.1 billion / sec vs 5.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 192 vs 80 |
| Floating-point performance | 601.3 gflops vs 104.0 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz vs 800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1323 vs 268 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 303 vs 298 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3365 vs 960 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3365 vs 960 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 vs 1771 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 vs 1771 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Radeon HD 5470
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | ATI Radeon HD 5470 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 268 | 1323 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 298 | 303 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 960 | 3365 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 960 | 3365 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1771 | 3325 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1771 | 3325 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4923 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.758 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 302.509 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.965 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.925 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 27.656 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2160 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2160 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| ATI Radeon HD 5470 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi |
| Code name | Cedar | GF106 |
| Launch date | 13 February 2012 | 13 September 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 1077 | 1137 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $129 | |
| Price now | $64.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 26.46 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 1566 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 104.0 gflops | 601.3 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 80 | 192 |
| Texture fill rate | 5.2 GTexel / s | 25.1 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 106 Watt |
| Transistor count | 292 million | 1,170 million |
| CUDA cores | 192 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 100 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 170 mm | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 6-pin |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB / s | 57.7 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare ATI Radeon HD 5470 with others
ATIRadeon HD 5470 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6750M
ATIRadeon HD 5470 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 545
ATIRadeon HD 5470 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7450A
ATIRadeon HD 5470 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5570
ATIRadeon HD 5470 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K4100M
ATIRadeon HD 5470 vs
IntelIris Graphics 6100
