ATI Radeon HD 5750 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT
Comparative analysis of ATI Radeon HD 5750 and NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5750
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 40% higher core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 500 MHz
- Around 5% higher texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 24 GTexel / s
- 7.5x more pipelines: 720 vs 96
- 4.2x better floating-point performance: 1,008.0 gflops vs 240 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 2.9x more memory clock speed: 4600 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1168 vs 381
- 4.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 338 vs 81
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3347 vs 3237
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3347 vs 3237
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 October 2009 vs 29 July 2008 |
| Core clock speed | 700 MHz vs 500 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s vs 24 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 720 vs 96 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,008.0 gflops vs 240 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1168 vs 381 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 338 vs 81 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3347 vs 3237 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3347 vs 3237 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT
- Around 32% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 86 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 86 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Radeon HD 5750
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | ATI Radeon HD 5750 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1168 | 381 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 338 | 81 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1039 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.384 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 460.31 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.679 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.118 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 53.346 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2124 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1757 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3347 | 3237 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2124 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1757 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3347 | 3237 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| ATI Radeon HD 5750 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla |
| Code name | Juniper | G92 |
| Design | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
| Launch date | 13 October 2009 | 29 July 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | 1209 | 1345 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 700 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,008.0 gflops | 240 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 720 | 96 |
| Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s | 24 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 86 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 754 million |
| CUDA cores | 96 | |
| Gigaflops | 360 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 178 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 73.6 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CUDA | ||
| PureVideo HD | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare ATI Radeon HD 5750 with others
ATIRadeon HD 5750 vs
ATIMobility Radeon 9600 PRO Turbo
ATIRadeon HD 5750 vs
ATIRadeon HD 3870 X2
ATIRadeon HD 5750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9300M G
ATIRadeon HD 5750 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6490M
ATIRadeon HD 5750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 625M
ATIRadeon HD 5750 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K2000
