ATI Radeon HD 5750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285
Comparative analysis of ATI Radeon HD 5750 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5750
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- 3x more pipelines: 720 vs 240
- Around 42% better floating-point performance: 1,008.0 gflops vs 708.5 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 86 Watt vs 204 Watt
- 3.7x more memory clock speed: 4600 MHz vs 1242 MHz
- 5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 338 vs 68
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 October 2009 vs 23 December 2008 |
| Pipelines | 720 vs 240 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,008.0 gflops vs 708.5 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 86 Watt vs 204 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz vs 1242 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 338 vs 68 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 1476 MHz vs 700 MHz
- 2.1x more texture fill rate: 51.8 billion / sec vs 25.2 GTexel / s
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1501 vs 1168
- 21.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 22124 vs 1039
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1476 MHz vs 700 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 51.8 billion / sec vs 25.2 GTexel / s |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1501 vs 1168 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 22124 vs 1039 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Radeon HD 5750
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | ATI Radeon HD 5750 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1168 | 1501 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 338 | 68 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1039 | 22124 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.384 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 460.31 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.679 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.118 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 53.346 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2124 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1757 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3347 | 3347 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2124 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1757 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3347 | 3347 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| ATI Radeon HD 5750 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | Juniper | GT200B |
| Design | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
| Launch date | 13 October 2009 | 23 December 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | 1209 | 1191 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $359 | |
| Price now | $179.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 9.17 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 700 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 1476 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,008.0 gflops | 708.5 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 720 | 240 |
| Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s | 51.8 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 86 Watt | 204 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,400 million |
| CUDA cores | 240 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVTwo Dual Link DVI |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 178 mm | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 73.6 GB / s | 159.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 512 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 1242 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare ATI Radeon HD 5750 with others
ATIRadeon HD 5750 vs
ATIMobility Radeon 9600 PRO Turbo
ATIRadeon HD 5750 vs
ATIRadeon HD 3870 X2
ATIRadeon HD 5750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9300M G
ATIRadeon HD 5750 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6490M
ATIRadeon HD 5750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 625M
ATIRadeon HD 5750 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K2000
