ATI Radeon HD 5750 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600
Comparative analysis of ATI Radeon HD 5750 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5750
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 17% higher core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 600 MHz
- Around 31% higher texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 19.2 GTexel / s
- 5.6x more pipelines: 720 vs 128
- 2.9x better floating-point performance: 1,008.0 gflops vs 345.6 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 90 nm
- Around 99% lower typical power consumption: 86 Watt vs 171 Watt
- 2.9x more memory clock speed: 4600 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1165 vs 525
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 337 vs 109
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3347 vs 3328
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3347 vs 3328
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 October 2009 vs 5 March 2007 |
Core clock speed | 700 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s vs 19.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 720 vs 128 |
Floating-point performance | 1,008.0 gflops vs 345.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 90 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 86 Watt vs 171 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1165 vs 525 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 337 vs 109 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3347 vs 3328 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3347 vs 3328 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 1536 MB vs 1 GB
Maximum memory size | 1536 MB vs 1 GB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Radeon HD 5750
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | ATI Radeon HD 5750 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1165 | 525 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 337 | 109 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 980 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.384 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 460.31 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.679 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.118 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 53.346 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2124 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1757 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3347 | 3328 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2124 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1757 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3347 | 3328 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI Radeon HD 5750 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla |
Code name | Juniper | G80 |
Design | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
Launch date | 13 October 2009 | 5 March 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 1232 | 1234 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,999 | |
Price now | $179.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 4.92 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 700 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 600 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,008.0 gflops | 345.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 90 nm |
Pipelines | 720 | 128 |
Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s | 19.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 86 Watt | 171 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 681 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 178 mm | 254 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1536 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 73.6 GB / s | 76.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity |